Le 25/02/2020 à 18:32, Scott Andrews via blfs-support a écrit :
>
> On 2/25/20 12:15 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-support wrote:
>> Le 25/02/2020 à 16:31, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-support a écrit :
>>> On 2/25/20 4:57 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-support wrote:
Le 25/02/2020 à 10:36, Pierre
On 2/25/20 11:15 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-support wrote:
Le 25/02/2020 à 16:31, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-support a écrit :
On 2/25/20 4:57 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-support wrote:
Le 25/02/2020 à 10:36, Pierre Labastie via blfs-support a écrit :
Le 25/02/2020 à 10:22, Thomas Seeling via
On 2/25/20 12:15 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-support wrote:
Le 25/02/2020 à 16:31, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-support a écrit :
On 2/25/20 4:57 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-support wrote:
Le 25/02/2020 à 10:36, Pierre Labastie via blfs-support a écrit :
Le 25/02/2020 à 10:22, Thomas Seeling via
On 2/25/20 10:38 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-support wrote:
On 2/25/20 7:27 AM, Thomas Seeling via blfs-support wrote:
Hallo,
sed -e 's/"(\\S+)"/"?([^\\s"]+)"?/' \
It replaces \S+ with [^\s"]+
ok, I'm defeated ;)
sorry, I overlooked the caret for "not".
What we end up with is: /^
Le 25/02/2020 à 16:31, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-support a écrit :
> On 2/25/20 4:57 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-support wrote:
>> Le 25/02/2020 à 10:36, Pierre Labastie via blfs-support a écrit :
>>> Le 25/02/2020 à 10:22, Thomas Seeling via blfs-support a écrit :
Hallo,
>> I made 2
On 2/25/20 7:27 AM, Thomas Seeling via blfs-support wrote:
Hallo,
sed -e 's/"(\\S+)"/"?([^\\s"]+)"?/' \
It replaces \S+ with [^\s"]+
ok, I'm defeated ;)
sorry, I overlooked the caret for "not".
What we end up with is: /^ *leapfile\s+"?([^\s"]+)"?/
Translated:
beginning of the line
zero
On 2/25/20 4:57 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-support wrote:
Le 25/02/2020 à 10:36, Pierre Labastie via blfs-support a écrit :
Le 25/02/2020 à 10:22, Thomas Seeling via blfs-support a écrit :
Hallo,
I made 2 simple changes to the script:
We already have a sed in the book which addresses
> >On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 11:18:58PM +0100, Cliff McDiarmid via blfs-support
> >wrote:>> > >> Hi> > Can anyone help here? I'm building Gtk+-2.24.13.
>All dependencies have been built as per book, but I'm getting:> >> 'Pango not
>found. Pango built with Cairo support is required to build
Hallo,
>>> sed -e 's/"(\\S+)"/"?([^\\s"]+)"?/' \
> It replaces \S+ with [^\s"]+
ok, I'm defeated ;)
sorry, I overlooked the caret for "not".
Tschau...Thomas
--
Do you wanna be a legend or a passing footprint on the sands of time?
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ:
Le 25/02/2020 à 14:04, Thomas Seeling via blfs-support a écrit :
> Hallo,
>
>> There is this:
>> ---
>> sed -e 's/"(\\S+)"/"?([^\\s"]+)"?/' \
>> -i scripts/update-leap/update-leap.in
>> ---
>> Doesn't this is enough?
>
> yes, I stand corrected, there is a fix, but it is defect as I noticed.
Hallo,
> There is this:
> ---
> sed -e 's/"(\\S+)"/"?([^\\s"]+)"?/' \
> -i scripts/update-leap/update-leap.in
> ---
> Doesn't this is enough?
yes, I stand corrected, there is a fix, but it is defect as I noticed.
It replaces \S+ with \s+ which mean exact opposite things.
\S is "any
Le 25/02/2020 à 10:36, Pierre Labastie via blfs-support a écrit :
> Le 25/02/2020 à 10:22, Thomas Seeling via blfs-support a écrit :
>> Hallo,
>>
I made 2 simple changes to the script:
>>> We already have a sed in the book which addresses that, don't we?
>>
>> I didn't verify before because
Le 25/02/2020 à 10:22, Thomas Seeling via blfs-support a écrit :
> Hallo,
>
>>> I made 2 simple changes to the script:
>> We already have a sed in the book which addresses that, don't we?
>
> I didn't verify before because we were discussing the current release,
> but I did now and it's not in
Hallo,
>> I made 2 simple changes to the script:
> We already have a sed in the book which addresses that, don't we?
I didn't verify before because we were discussing the current release,
but I did now and it's not in the book. The book mentions update-leap
but does not suggest any usage or
Le 25/02/2020 à 10:00, Thomas Seeling via blfs-support a écrit :
> Hallo,
>
>> update-leap is just a perl script that is part of ntp and appears
>> to be work in progress. It is suppose to read the location of the
>> leapsecond file from /etc/ntp.conf but it fails, that is why the
Hallo,
> update-leap is just a perl script that is part of ntp and appears
> to be work in progress. It is suppose to read the location of the
> leapsecond file from /etc/ntp.conf but it fails, that is why the
> -L flag is needed. It will work given the changes that I have made
16 matches
Mail list logo
