Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2

2019-11-17 Thread Christopher Gregory via blfs-support
> Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2019 at 9:05 PM > From: "Pierre Labastie via blfs-support" > > To: "Christopher Gregory via blfs-support" > > Cc: "Pierre Labastie" > Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2 > > Hi, > &

Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2

2019-11-09 Thread Pierre Labastie via blfs-support
opher Gregory" >> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2 >> >> >> >>> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2019 at 7:49 AM >>> From: "Christopher Gregory via blfs-support" >>> >>> To: blfs-support@lists.linuxfromscr

Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2

2019-11-08 Thread Christopher Gregory via blfs-support
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2019 at 4:54 PM > From: "Christopher Gregory via blfs-support" > > To: blfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org > Cc: "Christopher Gregory" > Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2 > > > > >

Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2

2019-11-06 Thread Christopher Gregory via blfs-support
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2019 at 7:49 AM > From: "Christopher Gregory via blfs-support" > > To: blfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org > Cc: "Christopher Gregory" > Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2 > > > > >

Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2

2019-11-06 Thread Christopher Gregory via blfs-support
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2019 at 4:59 AM > From: "Pierre Labastie via blfs-support" > > To: blfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org > Cc: "Pierre Labastie" > Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2 > > On 06/11/2019 16:16

Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2

2019-11-06 Thread Pierre Labastie via blfs-support
On 06/11/2019 16:16, Christopher Gregory via blfs-support wrote: Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2019 at 11:11 AM From: "Pierre Labastie via blfs-support" To: blfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Cc: "Pierre Labastie" Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2

Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2

2019-11-06 Thread Thomas Seeling via blfs-support
Hallo, > 1) The initramfs script that is in the book is a bit too simplistic > for actually being able to fix anything with regards to lvm. It > needs to have the lvm tools actually added to it. lvm is needed, as > vgscan and a few of the other tools are needed and are indeed > missing. I'm

Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2

2019-11-06 Thread Christopher Gregory via blfs-support
> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2019 at 11:11 AM > From: "Pierre Labastie via blfs-support" > > To: blfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org > Cc: "Pierre Labastie" > Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2 > > Le 05/11/2019 à 19:54,

Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2

2019-11-05 Thread Pierre Labastie via blfs-support
Le 05/11/2019 à 19:54, Christopher Gregory via blfs-support a écrit : > > << [...] > > Hello Pierre, > > The nightmare continues. I have now installed debian buster and it detected > the lfs installation the same way fedora does with os-prober: > > menuentry 'Linux From Scratch

Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2

2019-11-05 Thread Christopher Gregory via blfs-support
> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2019 at 3:30 AM > From: "Christopher Gregory via blfs-support" > > To: blfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org > Cc: "Christopher Gregory" > Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2 > > > > > S

Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2

2019-11-05 Thread Christopher Gregory via blfs-support
> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2019 at 2:54 AM > From: "Pierre Labastie via blfs-support" > > To: blfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org > Cc: "Pierre Labastie" > Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2 > > Le 05/11/2019 à 06:00,

Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2

2019-11-05 Thread Pierre Labastie via blfs-support
Le 05/11/2019 à 06:00, Christopher Gregory via blfs-support a écrit : > > >> Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2019 at 3:20 AM >> From: "Pierre Labastie via blfs-support" >> >> To: blfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org >> Cc: "Pierre Labastie"

Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2

2019-11-04 Thread Christopher Gregory via blfs-support
> Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2019 at 3:20 AM > From: "Pierre Labastie via blfs-support" > > To: blfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org > Cc: "Pierre Labastie" > Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2 > > On 26/10/2019 14:46, Christoph

Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2

2019-10-26 Thread Douglas R. Reno via blfs-support
On 10/26/19 9:20 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-support wrote: Pierre [1] I am not sure why Windows is using two small partitions + one big, but the computer came with that, and I just shrank the big partition to make room for linux. The reason why Windows does that is so that the recovery tools

Re: [blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2

2019-10-26 Thread Pierre Labastie via blfs-support
On 26/10/2019 14:46, Christopher Gregory via blfs-support wrote: > Hello, > > I am about to install another version of lfs/blfs on a new ssd hard drive, > and I am wanting to move all my drives to using lvm2. What I need to know is > the best approach for this. I understand that it needs to

[blfs-support] Best approach for lvm2

2019-10-26 Thread Christopher Gregory via blfs-support
Hello, I am about to install another version of lfs/blfs on a new ssd hard drive, and I am wanting to move all my drives to using lvm2. What I need to know is the best approach for this. I understand that it needs to happen at the partitioning stage of installing lfs. I was wondering if I