Re: [blfs-support] Two suggestions

2021-03-28 Thread Rainer Fiebig via blfs-support
Am 27.03.21 um 22:32 schrieb Bruce Dubbs via blfs-support: > On 3/27/21 1:54 PM, Rainer Fiebig via blfs-support wrote: > >> Ahh - this one made it! Despite containing "SPAM". So that's probably >> not the reason the other one did not come through. Really strange. >> >> I'm thinking about a

Re: [blfs-support] Two suggestions

2021-03-27 Thread Bruce Dubbs via blfs-support
On 3/27/21 1:54 PM, Rainer Fiebig via blfs-support wrote: Ahh - this one made it! Despite containing "SPAM". So that's probably not the reason the other one did not come through. Really strange. I'm thinking about a gmail-account. But I'm not too enthusiastic about google and such. I value

Re: [blfs-support] Two suggestions

2021-03-27 Thread Rainer Fiebig via blfs-support
Am 27.03.21 um 19:01 schrieb Pierre Labastie via blfs-support: > On Sat, 2021-03-27 at 16:58 +0100, Rainer Fiebig via blfs-support wrote: >>> Pierre Labastie wrote: >> >>> Have you checked the SPAM (or junk, or quarantine, or whatever) folder? >>> Some ISP's are becoming very picky with SPAM... >>

Re: [blfs-support] Two suggestions

2021-03-27 Thread Pierre Labastie via blfs-support
On Sat, 2021-03-27 at 16:58 +0100, Rainer Fiebig via blfs-support wrote: > > Pierre Labastie wrote: > > > Have you checked the SPAM (or junk, or quarantine, or whatever) folder? > > Some ISP's are becoming very picky with SPAM... > > > Pierre > > Sure, it's empty. > > But it may indeed have to

Re: [blfs-support] Two suggestions

2021-03-27 Thread Rainer Fiebig via blfs-support
> Pierre Labastie wrote: > Have you checked the SPAM (or junk, or quarantine, or whatever) folder? > Some ISP's are becoming very picky with SPAM... > Pierre Sure, it's empty. But it may indeed have to do with filters or blocklists. Your last message did *not* go through (saw it in the

Re: [blfs-support] Two suggestions

2021-03-27 Thread Pierre Labastie via blfs-support
On Sat, 2021-03-27 at 12:57 +0100, Rainer Fiebig via blfs-support wrote: > [...] > Sorry to have to answer you this way. But some mails from the list get > through to me and others don't. For whatever reason. > Have you checked the SPAM (or junk, or quarantine, or whatever) folder? Some ISP's

Re: [blfs-support] Two suggestions

2021-03-27 Thread Rainer Fiebig via blfs-support
Am 27.03.21 um 09:44 schrieb Pierre Labastie via blfs-support: > On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 14:00 -0400, Don Cross via blfs-support wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 1:36 PM Rainer Fiebig via blfs-support > supp...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> wrote: >>> Hi all! >>> >>> First, thanks to you and

Re: [blfs-support] Two suggestions

2021-03-27 Thread Pierre Labastie via blfs-support
On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 14:00 -0400, Don Cross via blfs-support wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 1:36 PM Rainer Fiebig via blfs-support supp...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > First, thanks to you and the team of LFS for your work and effort! I > > think that in terms

Re: [blfs-support] Two suggestions

2021-03-26 Thread Bruce Dubbs via blfs-support
On 3/26/21 12:36 PM, Rainer Fiebig via blfs-support wrote: Hi all! First, thanks to you and the team of LFS for your work and effort! I think that in terms of digital self-empowerment LFS/BLFS is the most important and most valuable Linux-distribution of all. There is hardly anything to

Re: [blfs-support] Two suggestions

2021-03-26 Thread Don Cross via blfs-support
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 1:36 PM Rainer Fiebig via blfs-support < blfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> wrote: > Hi all! > > First, thanks to you and the team of LFS for your work and effort! I > think that in terms of digital self-empowerment LFS/BLFS is the most > important and most valuable