On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 19:33 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Sure, except they're actually for PolicyKit, not GConf itself
> (my memory is unreliable). A random link is
> http://ftp.uni-kl.de/pub/linux/gentoo-portage/sys-auth/policykit/files/
Ah, that makes more sense than GConf depending on PAM itsel
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 07:30:02PM -0700, Nathan Coulson wrote:
> I do have glibc 2.10.1, I'll rebuild a new LFS system w/ gcc 4.4.1
> instead of 4.4.0.
Can anyone replicate this problem under an LFS 6.5 system? If there is a
problem here then it should be reproducible.
Also, please reply below
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:40:24 -0700, Nathan Coulson wrote:
> I am having the following problems when compiling cdrtools with the latest
> book
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/mnt/raid5/book/blfs/38/cdrtools-2.01/libschily'
> ==> COMPILING "OBJ/x86_64-linux-cc/fexec.o"
> In file included fro
When I was trying to build Dash, I got these messages:
if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -include ../config.h -DBSD=1
-DSHELL -DIFS_BROKEN -Wall -g -O2 -MT eval.o -MD -MP -MF
".deps/eval.Tpo" -c -o eval.o eval.c; \
then mv -f ".deps/eval.Tpo" ".deps/eval.Po"; else rm -f
".deps/eval.Tpo
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 05:46:57AM -0600, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> I can reproduce this on a clean LFS-6.5-rc2 build. It looks as it the
> patch isn't enough to handle the getline, getdelim and fexecve functions in
> newer Glibc's. The attached patch lets things build for me.
Hmm.. that's odd. I
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 07:41:01AM -0400, William Immendorf wrote:
> When I was trying to build Dash, I got these messages:
>
> if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -include ../config.h -DBSD=1
> -DSHELL -DIFS_BROKEN -Wall -g -O2 -MT eval.o -MD -MP -MF
> ".deps/eval.Tpo" -c -o eval.o eval.c; \
>
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 07:41:01 -0400, William Immendorf
wrote:
> When I was trying to build Dash, I got these messages:
>
> if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -include ../config.h -DBSD=1
> -DSHELL -DIFS_BROKEN -Wall -g -O2 -MT eval.o -MD -MP -MF
> ".deps/eval.Tpo" -c -o eval.o eval.c; \
>
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 06:45:38AM -0600, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> This is an upstream bug, and as such should be reported there.
Do you have a URL for the ticket?
pgpUU93Y1y0iZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfrom
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:23:01 +0100, Guy Dalziel
wrote:
> See the attached patch, does this fix the issue?
Yes, it does! Thanks very much Guy.
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See th
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:51:31 +0100, Guy Dalziel
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 06:45:38AM -0600, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>> This is an upstream bug, and as such should be reported there.
>
> Do you have a URL for the ticket?
No, I was suggesting that William report this upstream as I don't thi
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 6:56:26 -0600, Matthew Burgess
wrote:
> I had a look at their mailing list archives [0] and couldn't see a similar
> report
> (and google couldn't either).
That missing [0] reference is:
http://www.mail-archive.com/d...@vger.kernel.org/
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfro
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 06:57:50AM -0600, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> That missing [0] reference is:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/d...@vger.kernel.org/
Ah, I've already looked through that, a project mailing list is usually
the first place I look. Since it compiles for me, there doesn't appear to
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 14:10:00 +0100, Guy Dalziel
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 06:57:50AM -0600, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>> That missing [0] reference is:
>>
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/d...@vger.kernel.org/
>
> Ah, I've already looked through that, a project mailing list is usually
> the
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 07:15:13AM -0600, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Yes, I can reproduce it at will here. Stock LFS-6.5-rc2 and no compiler
> flags set
> in my environment:
It's odd that I'm not experiencing the same problems that everyone else
seems to be. Do you think that there could be a prob
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 14:33:56 +0100, Guy Dalziel
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 07:15:13AM -0600, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>> Yes, I can reproduce it at will here. Stock LFS-6.5-rc2 and no compiler
>> flags set in my environment:
>
> It's odd that I'm not experiencing the same problems that ever
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 7:52:48 -0600, Matthew Burgess
wrote:
> Now to track down which of those tools called out to from mkbuiltins is
> causing the
> issue!
And the culprit is `sort'. Building coreutils without LFS' i18n patch is
enough to get
things working again. I'll pop this issue over to
> - Original Message -
> From: "Trent Shea"
> To: "BLFS Support List"
> Subject: Re: Using phonon from kde-qt
> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:19:36 -0600
>
> To build against the phonon included with qt you will need to create a
> link: qtdir/include/Phonon -> qtdir/include/phonon/Phonon (
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Matthew
Burgess wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 7:52:48 -0600, Matthew Burgess
> wrote:
>> Now to track down which of those tools called out to from mkbuiltins is
>> causing the
>> issue!
>
> And the culprit is `sort'. Building coreutils without LFS' i18n patch is
2009/8/15 Simon Geard :
> On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 19:33 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> Sure, except they're actually for PolicyKit, not GConf itself
>> (my memory is unreliable). A random link is
>> http://ftp.uni-kl.de/pub/linux/gentoo-portage/sys-auth/policykit/files/
>
> Ah, that makes more sense t
19 matches
Mail list logo
