Heartbleed vulnerability
http://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html
OpenSSL 1.0.1 through 1.0.1f (inclusive) are vulnerable
OpenSSL 1.0.1g is NOT vulnerable
OpenSSL 1.0.0 branch is NOT vulnerable
OpenSSL 0.9.8 branch is NOT vulnerable
Suggest immediate revision to BLFS 7.5 OpenSSL-1.0.1f
On Tuesday 08 April 2014 18:02:38 Rob Taylor wrote:
Heartbleed vulnerability
http://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html
OpenSSL 1.0.1 through 1.0.1f (inclusive) are vulnerable
OpenSSL 1.0.1g is NOT vulnerable
OpenSSL 1.0.0 branch is NOT vulnerable
OpenSSL 0.9.8 branch is NOT
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:41 AM, lux-integ lux-in...@btconnect.com wrote:
openssl is a package one generally installs early in the distribution-build
process. To upgrade to say openssl-1.0.1g
--(a) does one need to yank out the old say openssl-1.0.1 and install the new
1,0,1g and if so
Alexey Orishko wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:41 AM, lux-integ lux-in...@btconnect.com wrote:
openssl is a package one generally installs early in the distribution-build
process. To upgrade to say openssl-1.0.1g
--(a) does one need to yank out the old say openssl-1.0.1 and install the
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:41:16AM +0100, lux-integ wrote:
openssl is a package one generally installs early in the distribution-build
process. To upgrade to say openssl-1.0.1g
--(a) does one need to yank out the old say openssl-1.0.1 and install the
new
1,0,1g and if so would
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 08:55:01PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:41:16AM +0100, lux-integ wrote:
openssl is a package one generally installs early in the
distribution-build
process. To upgrade to say openssl-1.0.1g
--(a) does one need to yank out the old
Would it be best to just restart your system after an upgrade? In the
version of the book I have, it said something about an Xorg Server
dependency being OpenSSL (thats why I install it right before Xorg).
Douglas Reno
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ:
