Re: [blfs-support] Sudo
> > Le 04/04/2014 12:27, Fernando de Oliveira a ?crit : > > Em 04-04-2014 06:24, Pierre Labastie escreveu: > >> > >>> I go have a look and correct if necessary. > >>> > >>> Pierre > >> Done at r12930. > > My script is as the book now. I had that change to be done, probably > > more than one update ago, thought had done it. Perhaps it got back > > during the discussion about removing libexec, then not doing it for > > sudo. But I should have noticed it. Apologies to all. > > > No big deal, I took it, because I thought you'd prefer update the GNOME > packages, rather than correcting a harmless typo... > > Pierre > Thanks Pierre and Fernando for the quick response; I realise that the error was a typo that didn't actually affect the build, and I know that you guys are really busy. Let me take this opportunity to say that I believe the lists and the *LFS books are the best GNU/Linux resources on the Web, and thanks again for all the help that you and the others have provided over the years. Maybe that's not said often enough. Richard -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] Sudo
Le 04/04/2014 12:27, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit : > Em 04-04-2014 06:24, Pierre Labastie escreveu: >> >>> I go have a look and correct if necessary. >>> >>> Pierre >> Done at r12930. > My script is as the book now. I had that change to be done, probably > more than one update ago, thought had done it. Perhaps it got back > during the discussion about removing libexec, then not doing it for > sudo. But I should have noticed it. Apologies to all. > No big deal, I took it, because I thought you'd prefer update the GNOME packages, rather than correcting a harmless typo... Pierre -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] Sudo
Em 04-04-2014 06:24, Pierre Labastie escreveu: > Le 04/04/2014 11:11, Pierre Labastie a écrit : >> Le 04/04/2014 10:54, Richard Melville a écrit : >>> >>> On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 6:46:05 PM Richard Melville wrote: >>> > There's an error in the book's suggested configure commands: >>> > --libexecdir=/usr/lib/sudo should be --libexecdir=/usr/lib. >>> Both current >>> > books have this error which surely would produce "two" sudo >>> directories; >>> > one below the other. >>> > >>> > Richard >>> >>> You are incorrect there Richard. >>> >>> I have used those instructions for sudo and it does NOT as you >>> state produce >>> two sudo directories. >>> >>> >>> Maybe we are both right :-) I didn't run make && make install with >>> the book's instructions so I can't confirm that two directories *are* >>> produced. >>> >>> >>> >>> Try running ./configure --help and looking at the maintainers >>> instructions. >>> >>> Christopher >>> >>> >>> I's a fact, however, that if you run --libexecdir=/usr/lib/sudo you >>> *will* receive a warning from the configure script that reads: >>> WARNING: libexecdir should not include the "sudo" subdirectory. >>> Running --libexecdir=/usr/lib does not produce the warning, but >>> still provides the required /usr/lib/sudo. >>> >>> If, as you say, two directories *aren't* produced then the configure >>> script must be compensating for the error. However, it is *still* an >>> error and should be rectified in the book. >>> >>> >> I go have a look and correct if necessary. >> >> Pierre > Done at r12930. My script is as the book now. I had that change to be done, probably more than one update ago, thought had done it. Perhaps it got back during the discussion about removing libexec, then not doing it for sudo. But I should have noticed it. Apologies to all. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] Sudo
Le 04/04/2014 11:11, Pierre Labastie a écrit : Le 04/04/2014 10:54, Richard Melville a écrit : On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 6:46:05 PM Richard Melville wrote: > There's an error in the book's suggested configure commands: > --libexecdir=/usr/lib/sudo should be --libexecdir=/usr/lib. Both current > books have this error which surely would produce "two" sudo directories; > one below the other. > > Richard You are incorrect there Richard. I have used those instructions for sudo and it does NOT as you state produce two sudo directories. Maybe we are both right :-) I didn't run make && make install with the book's instructions so I can't confirm that two directories *are* produced. Try running ./configure --help and looking at the maintainers instructions. Christopher I's a fact, however, that if you run --libexecdir=/usr/lib/sudo you *will* receive a warning from the configure script that reads: WARNING: libexecdir should not include the "sudo" subdirectory. Running --libexecdir=/usr/lib does not produce the warning, but still provides the required /usr/lib/sudo. If, as you say, two directories *aren't* produced then the configure script must be compensating for the error. However, it is *still* an error and should be rectified in the book. I go have a look and correct if necessary. Pierre Done at r12930. Pierre -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] Sudo
Le 04/04/2014 10:54, Richard Melville a écrit : On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 6:46:05 PM Richard Melville wrote: > There's an error in the book's suggested configure commands: > --libexecdir=/usr/lib/sudo should be --libexecdir=/usr/lib. Both current > books have this error which surely would produce "two" sudo directories; > one below the other. > > Richard You are incorrect there Richard. I have used those instructions for sudo and it does NOT as you state produce two sudo directories. Maybe we are both right :-) I didn't run make && make install with the book's instructions so I can't confirm that two directories *are* produced. Try running ./configure --help and looking at the maintainers instructions. Christopher I's a fact, however, that if you run --libexecdir=/usr/lib/sudo you *will* receive a warning from the configure script that reads: WARNING: libexecdir should not include the "sudo" subdirectory. Running --libexecdir=/usr/lib does not produce the warning, but still provides the required /usr/lib/sudo. If, as you say, two directories *aren't* produced then the configure script must be compensating for the error. However, it is *still* an error and should be rectified in the book. I go have a look and correct if necessary. Pierre -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] Sudo
> > On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 6:46:05 PM Richard Melville wrote: > > There's an error in the book's suggested configure commands: > > --libexecdir=/usr/lib/sudo should be --libexecdir=/usr/lib. Both > current > > books have this error which surely would produce "two" sudo directories; > > one below the other. > > > > Richard > > You are incorrect there Richard. > > I have used those instructions for sudo and it does NOT as you state > produce > two sudo directories. > Maybe we are both right :-) I didn't run make && make install with the book's instructions so I can't confirm that two directories *are* produced. > > Try running ./configure --help and looking at the maintainers instructions. > > Christopher > > I's a fact, however, that if you run --libexecdir=/usr/lib/sudo you *will* receive a warning from the configure script that reads: WARNING: libexecdir should not include the "sudo" subdirectory. Running --libexecdir=/usr/lib does not produce the warning, but still provides the required /usr/lib/sudo. If, as you say, two directories *aren't* produced then the configure script must be compensating for the error. However, it is *still* an error and should be rectified in the book. Richard -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] Sudo
On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 6:46:05 PM Richard Melville wrote: > There's an error in the book's suggested configure commands: > --libexecdir=/usr/lib/sudo should be --libexecdir=/usr/lib. Both current > books have this error which surely would produce "two" sudo directories; > one below the other. > > Richard You are incorrect there Richard. I have used those instructions for sudo and it does NOT as you state produce two sudo directories. Try running ./configure --help and looking at the maintainers instructions. Christopher -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
