[blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: “uuid-in-package” navigation with Web Bundles

Primary eng (and PM) emails hay...@chromium.org, ksakam...@chromium.org, denom...@chromium.org Summary Deprecate and remove the “uuid-in-package” navigation support with Web Bundles, which is an extension

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Protected Audience Bidding & Auction Services

Contact emailspauljen...@chromium.org, kle...@google.com Explainer Browser API: https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/blob/main/FLEDGE_browser_bidding_and_auction_API.md Bidding & Auction Services: https://github.com/privacysandbox/fledge-docs/blob/main/bidding_auction_services_api.md Specificatio

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add value argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete()

It would be something like this - https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/rDaQdKpWAx8/m/qjTlRNShAgAJ ☆*PhistucK* On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 10:25 AM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > Hey Andreu, > > Can you give an example of what the code looks like that calls the methods > with a second

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private State Tokens API

Thanks, we'll work on fixing those two issues. I'm not sure what the general flow for enrollment in DevTools will look like, but if there's a general flow to detect when enrollment is missing for other APIs that check at runtime, we can try to integrate with that when PST calls are made with an un

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship : Content-type in Resource Timing

On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 4:43 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > I see that both the Resource Timing > and Fetch > PRs have landed - does that > mean this I2S is unblocked now (and just needs an LGTM3)? > I believe

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship : Content-type in Resource Timing

I see that both the Resource Timing and Fetch PRs have landed - does that mean this I2S is unblocked now (and just needs an LGTM3)? On 5/3/23 3:55 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: Update: +Anne van Kesteren

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Network Access preflight requests for subresources

Titouan, et.al. Is this still awaiting more feedback, and/or another intent to ship? This post: https://developer.chrome.com/blog/private-network-access-update/ was brought to my attention by our marketing department, but appears to be concerned with mixed content. (I do not expect our mark

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add value argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete()

Hey! update from mozilla's side they seem to be positive: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/801#issuecomment-1547693061 On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 2:55:45 PM UTC+5:30 Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > Hey Andreu, > > Can you give an example of what the code looks like that calls th

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Legacy callback-based RTCPeerConnection.getStats() API

Thanks Mason, we're reaching out On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 3:27 AM Mason Freed wrote: > Chiming in briefly here - it appears (from my console messages) that > BrowserStack is currently hitting this deprecation. BrowserStack sessions > in M115 restart on ~5 second intervals with a console error poi

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Add value argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete()

No worries at all! :) On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 10:43 AM Debadree Chatterjee wrote: > Hey! so sorry for missing it I filed for moving it to the Intent to Ship > stage since it was recommended that it's small enough a feature to move to > that stage here: > https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add value argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete()

Hey Andreu, Can you give an example of what the code looks like that calls the methods with a second argument? Best regards, Philip On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 8:51 PM Andreu Botella wrote: > jornalmassa.com.br doesn't seem to be calling these methods with two > arguments, at least in my testing.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Add value argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete()

Hey! so sorry for missing it I filed for moving it to the Intent to Ship stage since it was recommended that it's small enough a feature to move to that stage here: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/rDaQdKpWAx8 I have also filed for a Mozilla standards position as you menti

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Add value argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete()

Thanks for working towards alignment here! :) On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 2:25 PM Debadree Chatterjee wrote: > Contact emailsdebadree...@gmail.com > > ExplainerNone > > Specificationhttps://url.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-urlsearchparams-has > > Summary > This feature adds the ability to pass a `value` arg