Re: [blink-dev] Ready for Trial: Deprecate TLS SHA-1 server signatures

On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 7:15 PM 'David Adrian' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Contact emailsdadr...@google.com > > ExplainerNone > > Specificationhttps://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9155.html > > Summary > > Chrome is removing support for signature algorithms using SHA-1 for server

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTPS Upgrades

Thanks for working on this! On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 11:44 PM Chris Thompson wrote: > Thanks all. Some updates: > >- We have filed a TAG review request > >- We are working on writing WPTs and we will update this thread when >

Re: [blink-dev] Re: PSA: WebDriver changes now go through the API owners intent process

In ChromeDriver, we don’t have feature flags per se. Instead the mechanism we have available is vendor-prefixed command mappings .

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: @scope

Hi all, I realize this is kind of late in the feedback process, but while reading the syntax examples here I found myself pretty confused by the meaning of the "to" keyword. Especially given that the tendency is to read it as the English language sentence "Scope .foo to .bar", it seems to

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTPS Upgrades

Thanks all. Some updates: - We have filed a TAG review request - We are working on writing WPTs and we will update this thread when those are ready -- thanks for the added details about how those are run - We have added a

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: Conservative page freezing on desktop

On Friday, June 2, 2023 at 1:02:39 PM UTC-4 Michaela Merz wrote: Thank you Francois. Here's an experience I'd like to share with you. I was watching and listening to a training presentation yesterday and was asked to look something up. So I opened a new tab to start looking it up. But the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add value argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete()

hello! I checked in safari technology preview pretty weird I dont observe the same breaking behaviour, I am trying to investigate why that is so! On Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 8:49:22 PM UTC+5:30 Debadree Chatterjee wrote: > Thank you so much for finding out simon!! so then nuxt is probably not

Re: [blink-dev] Re: PSA: WebDriver changes now go through the API owners intent process

On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 10:25 AM Christian Biesinger wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 12:48 PM Chris Harrelson > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 9:30 AM Raphael Kubo da Costa < >> raphael.kubo.da.co...@intel.com> wrote: >> >>> Op 31-05-2023 om 20:44 schreef Chris Harrelson: >>> >

Re: [blink-dev] Re: PSA: WebDriver changes now go through the API owners intent process

On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 12:48 PM Chris Harrelson wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 9:30 AM Raphael Kubo da Costa < > raphael.kubo.da.co...@intel.com> wrote: > >> Op 31-05-2023 om 20:44 schreef Chris Harrelson: >> > TL;DR: going forward, new WebDriver Classic and WebDriver BiDi APIs in >> >

[blink-dev] Ready for Trial: Deprecate TLS SHA-1 server signatures

Contact emailsdadr...@google.com ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9155.html Summary Chrome is removing support for signature algorithms using SHA-1 for server signatures during the TLS handshake. This does not affect SHA-1 support in server certificates, which was

Re: [blink-dev] Re: PSA: WebDriver changes now go through the API owners intent process

On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 9:30 AM Raphael Kubo da Costa < raphael.kubo.da.co...@intel.com> wrote: > Op 31-05-2023 om 20:44 schreef Chris Harrelson: > > TL;DR: going forward, new WebDriver Classic and WebDriver BiDi APIs in > > Chromium need to go through the Intent process, including in particular >

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: overflow:overlay aliases overflow:auto

Hi, On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 7:59 AM may b wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed today while working on our product that the overflow:overlay > feature is no longer working. I finally stumbled upon this thread that it > has been aliased into auto. I think it's really unfortunate that this > feature is no

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: @scope

On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 5:54 PM slightlyoff via Chromestatus < admin+slightly...@cr-status.appspotmail.com> wrote: > LGTM3. If we have a potential `:visited` issue, we should make sure this > is shipped with a feature flag for the next few releases. The long term > solution for `:visited` is to

[blink-dev] Re: PSA: WebDriver changes now go through the API owners intent process

Op 31-05-2023 om 20:44 schreef Chris Harrelson: TL;DR: going forward, new WebDriver Classic and WebDriver BiDi APIs in Chromium need to go through the Intent process, including in particular Intent to Prototype and Intent to Ship. See here

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype & Ship: Report Critical-CH caused restart in NavigationTiming

LGTM3 /Daniel On 2023-06-07 17:37, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 5:36 PM Chris Harrelson wrote: Thanks! LGTM1 On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 6:55 AM Ari Chivukula wrote: I'm back! The code has been merged behind a flag w/ wpts:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Capture all screens

Also, it would be good to file a TAG review sooner than later to prevent any delays at a possible future I2S time. On 6/7/23 11:53 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 1:57 PM Simon Hangl wrote: Contact emails simo...@google.com Explainer

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype & Ship: Report Critical-CH caused restart in NavigationTiming

LGTM2 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: @scope

LGTM3. If we have a potential `:visited` issue, we should make sure this is shipped with a feature flag for the next few releases. The long term solution for `:visited` is to make it less brittle (aka "directed visitedness") as we're going to keep adding new combinators that invalidate the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Capture all screens

LGTM On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 1:57 PM Simon Hangl wrote: > Contact emails > > simo...@google.com > > Explainer > > https://github.com/screen-share/capture-all-screens/blob/main/explainer.md > > Specification > > https://screen-share.github.io/capture-all-screens/ > > Design docs > >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: BYOB support for Fetch

LGTM3 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype & Ship: Report Critical-CH caused restart in NavigationTiming

LGTM2 On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 5:36 PM Chris Harrelson wrote: > Thanks! LGTM1 > > On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 6:55 AM Ari Chivukula wrote: > >> I'm back! The code has been merged behind a flag w/ wpts: >> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4538244 >> >> The spec changes have

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype & Ship: Report Critical-CH caused restart in NavigationTiming

Thanks! LGTM1 On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 6:55 AM Ari Chivukula wrote: > I'm back! The code has been merged behind a flag w/ wpts: > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4538244 > > The spec changes have been merged too: > https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/pull/188 >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Remove: document.open sandbox inheritance

LGTM3 /Daniel On 2023-06-05 16:20, Mike Taylor wrote: The risk seems quite low here, thanks for the explanation. LGTM2. On 6/5/23 6:10 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 to remove On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 10:15 AM Arthur Sonzogni wrote: Contact emails

Re: [blink-dev] Understand DOM updates

We have a function "ContainerNode::RebuildLayoutTreeForChild" that gets called for each node which needs change in layout. But the layout object attached to the node at this point is still older one. I have checked " LocalFrameView

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: JPEG XL decoding support (image/jxl) in blink

> > *Update:* > > Firefox: > In testing builds. (Neutral - depending on support from community.) > > Safari (& iOS): > Currently undergoing testing & implementation as of latest iOS/macOS dev > previews. (Positive.) > > Web Developers & Community: > (Very Positive Support) > > - - - - -

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype & Ship: Report Critical-CH caused restart in NavigationTiming

I'm back! The code has been merged behind a flag w/ wpts: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4538244 The spec changes have been merged too: https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/pull/188 https://github.com/WICG/client-hints-infrastructure/pull/153 ~ Ari Chivukula

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: BYOB support for Fetch

On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 10:01 AM Adam Rice wrote: > I agree that these patterns are likely to be rare, making this a low risk >> endeavor. Please still make sure the flags are working as expected, and >> slowly roll this out, just to be on the safe side. > > > Is it sufficient to roll-out the new

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTPS Upgrades

How will this affect login to captive portals (WiFi login), which frequently rely on rewriting HTTP requests? On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 12:00 AM 'Panos Astithas' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 7:31 AM Mike West wrote: > >> >> -mike >> >> >> On Wed, May

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: BYOB support for Fetch

> > I agree that these patterns are likely to be rare, making this a low risk > endeavor. Please still make sure the flags are working as expected, and > slowly roll this out, just to be on the safe side. Is it sufficient to roll-out the new cloning behaviour and the BYOB support separately, or

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: @scope

On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 4:07 PM Artur Janc wrote: > I'm wondering how @scope will interact with :visited (to make sure we > avoid exposing the visitedness of links as per > https://dbaron.org/mozilla/visited-privacy) The exact privacy measures related to :visited/:link (in general) are

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: BYOB support for Fetch

LGTM2 I agree that these patterns are likely to be rare, making this a low risk endeavor. Please still make sure the flags are working as expected, and slowly roll this out, just to be on the safe side. On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 8:27 AM Nidhi Jaju wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 1:01 PM Yoav