[blink-dev] Web-Facing Change PSA: SharedWorker script inherit controller for blob script URL

2024-03-04 Thread Yoshisato Yanagisawa
Contact emailsyyanagis...@google.com Specification https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/#control-and-use-worker-client Summary According to https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/#control-and-use-worker-client, workers should inherit controllers for the blob URL. However, existing code allows only

[blink-dev] Web-Facing Change PSA: Stop modifying author-defined selection colors

2024-03-04 Thread Stephen Chenney
Contact emailsschen...@chromium.org Specificationhttps://www.w3.org/TR/css-pseudo-4/#selectordef-selection Summary Chromium currently checks all selection highlight colors against the text color and inverts the highlight color if it matches the text. Hence, author-defined ::selection CSS

[blink-dev] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Intent to Prototype: ARIA Notify API

2024-03-04 Thread 'Ethan Jimenez' via blink-dev
Updating Chrome status entry and subject of this thread. --Ethan On Friday, December 1, 2023 at 9:57:14 AM UTC-8 Sara Tang wrote: > Hi all! > > Letting everyone know that we are picking up this initiative again :) > Please find an updated explainer here: >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Add JavaScript timer wake up alignment for unimportant cross-origin frames

2024-03-04 Thread Domenic Denicola
In general, I think it's best to file a formal Intent to Ship if you want to go to 50% stable. To me it sounds like that might be reasonable here? I.e. you're fairly confident that the feature is a good idea to ship, but you want to do a more cautious rollout. I think many Intent to Ships go

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebSocketStream

2024-03-04 Thread Adam Rice
Thanks Alex, We have a partner who need backpressure to avoid jank in their app. I've been waiting for them to comment, but it's taking a while. Adam On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 at 01:53, Alex Russell wrote: > Hey Adam, > > Sorry for the slow follow up. Were there folks beyond the Deno ecosystem >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: MP4 container support for MediaRecorder

2024-03-04 Thread 'Sunggook Chue' via blink-dev
Mike, I've added feature detection and developer engagement on https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WV795DHY3Jf2p_htuAKZ9DXUefiGdQs29mCb8vRiHt8/edit?usp=sharing. On Monday, March 4, 2024 at 2:13:11 PM UTC-8 Sunggook Chue wrote: > Yoav, > > Philipp's answer is correct, please let me know if you

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: MP4 container support for MediaRecorder

2024-03-04 Thread 'Sunggook Chue' via blink-dev
Yoav, Philipp's answer is correct, please let me know if you need any more info to unblock. On Thursday, February 29, 2024 at 11:53:47 AM UTC-8 philipp...@googlemail.com wrote: > Yoav, > > in WebRTC land "we have a sample for that" (thanks to the one and only > WebRTC devrel guy Sam Dutton,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: FedCM CORS requirement on ID assertion endpoint

2024-03-04 Thread Mike Taylor
LGTM1 On 3/4/24 1:33 PM, Nicolás Peña wrote: Contact emails n...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/fedidcg/FedCM/issues/428 Specification https://github.com/fedidcg/FedCM/pull/547

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Add JavaScript timer wake up alignment for unimportant cross-origin frames

2024-03-04 Thread Mike Taylor
My concern is going from 1% to 50% on stable - if something does go wrong, that's a _lot_ of folks who will experience it. Are you open to something smaller like 5%? If not, why not? thx On 2/29/24 12:34 AM, Zheda Chen wrote: The volume of data on Beta is too low to draw any conclusion.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Used color scheme root scrollbars

2024-03-04 Thread Mike Taylor
Thanks for the summary of the experiment results on Edge - sounds positive. If this is purely a browser UI change, then we don't really need the blink-dev process at all. However, if we're relying on concepts defined in a CSSWG draft, and devs can change the outcome w/ some CSS (or maybe

[blink-dev] Web-Facing Change PSA: Lazy load scroll margin for iframes

2024-03-04 Thread 'Yotam Hacohen' via blink-dev
Contact emailsyo...@google.com Specificationhttps://html.spec.whatwg.org/#lazy-load-root-margin Design docs https://gist.github.com/tcaptan-cr/bf0ac25f77cb6b6c58c916e6577d91c3 Summary Changes the lazy load intersection observer's init dictionary to use a scrollMargin instead of a rootMargin.

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: FedCM CORS requirement on ID assertion endpoint

2024-03-04 Thread Nicolás Peña
Contact emails n...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/fedidcg/FedCM/issues/428 Specification https://github.com/fedidcg/FedCM/pull/547 Summary The fetches in the FedCM API are hard to reason about because of the properties required of them. While there is ongoing discussion

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience: Downsampled forDebugOnly & Increase number of component ads

2024-03-04 Thread Paul Jensen
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 12:24 PM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 6:07 PM 'Orr Bernstein' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Contact emails >> >> pauljen...@chromium.org >> >> >> Explainer >> >> Downsampled forDebugOnly:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Interoperable mousemove default action

2024-03-04 Thread Mustaq Ahmed
UKM data shows that only a few popular sites are affecting our use-counters. We already confirmed that one of those sites is not broken at all, only showing text selection on menu items. We are expecting to conclude soon after investigating all those sites. On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 1:48 PM

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Document Render-Blocking

2024-03-04 Thread Vladimir Levin
Contact emailsvmp...@chromium.org, nrosent...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/view-transitions/blob/main/document-render-blocking.md#blocking-element-id Specification https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/links.html#link-type-expect Summary This feature enables authors to block

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate and Remove Web SQL

2024-03-04 Thread Hans Meyer
Fair enough Anton. Admittedly a bit of wishful thinking on my part. Although FWIW, the origin trial status in dev tools only mentions the expiration date, not version. By no means an excuse, but I'm curious, why express the trial expiration in terms of a date at all, much less a date that is

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: PNA permission prompt for non-fetch requests

2024-03-04 Thread 'Yifan Luo' via blink-dev
Maybe I need a better naming. The original PNA permission prompt requires developers to manually add a new fetch option "targetAddressSpace". So for the non-fetch requests, e.g. iframes, image elements, etc., we attempt to let websites to claim the targetAddressSpace in an earlier stage, which