[blink-dev] Re: Intent to implement and ship: TLS 1.3 certificate compression with Brotli

2024-06-27 Thread David Benjamin
/ Zlib compression) > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1885138 > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1881027 > > пятница, 6 июля 2018 г. в 22:33:47 UTC+3, David Benjamin: > >> As additional motivation, this is part of the path towards QUIC >> standardiz

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Remove Authorization header upon cross-origin redirect

2024-04-16 Thread David Benjamin
Keep in mind also that cross-origin and same-origin requests generally behave very differently on the web, not just in this specific way. So if you're redirecting a portion of your origin in your dev environment, other things will also behave differently. I recognize that's not how your current dev

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: X25519Kyber768 key encapsulation for TLS on Desktop

2024-03-19 Thread David Benjamin
> I'm guessing we're talking about MITM middleboxes, is that correct? > What's our plan to mitigate that risk? Slow rollout? Enterprise policy? Both? Something else entirely? Whether the middlebox MITMs the TLS connection is not terribly important. As long as they attempt to parse the ClientHello,

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: TLS trust expressions

2024-02-29 Thread David Benjamin
Contact emailsdavid...@chromium.org, asymmet...@chromium.org, b...@chromium.org, dadr...@google.com Explainer https://github.com/davidben/tls-trust-expressions/blob/main/explainer.md Specification https://davidben.github.io/tls-trust-expressions/draft-davidben-tls-trust-expr.html Summary TLS tr

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Zstd Content-Encoding

2024-02-14 Thread David Benjamin
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 9:20 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > LGTM1 > > On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 at 2:36:10 AM UTC+1 Nidhi Jaju wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 2:48 AM James Hartig wrote: > > My employer ran into the window size during our pre-production valid

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: No-Vary-Search support in navigation prefetch cache

2023-11-10 Thread David Benjamin
Additionally, even if Chromium currently only uses it for prefetch logic, the semantics seem to be about general HTTP caching. There's tons of interest and expertise in httpbis around caching and how to optimize it, so it's definitely the right venue for this work. I expect you'll find many people

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Origin Isolation By Default / Deprecate document.domain on stable

2023-10-29 Thread David Benjamin
To clarify, rejecting the header *is* interpreting it properly. It's not that duplicates aren't allowed, it's that there is no such thing as a duplicate header in HTTP. Specifying two headers with the same name is *not* a no-op. Rather, sending two headers with the same name is simply another synta

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Deprecate TLS SHA-1 server signatures

2023-10-10 Thread David Benjamin
me reports can be found here as well: > > > https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=ERR_SSL_PROTOCOL_ERROR&can=2 > > On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 6:04:54 PM UTC+1 David Benjamin wrote: > >> Yup, it's finch-gated. (Finch feature name in the orig

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Deprecate TLS SHA-1 server signatures

2023-09-27 Thread David Benjamin
correct, since it is so hard to measure with a > high accuracy. > > /Daniel > On 2023-09-26 18:33, David Benjamin wrote: > > To clarify, I meant that we should apply this to WebRTC *in a > separate launch*. This one will just be HTTPS. We don't have numbers or a > fl

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Deprecate TLS SHA-1 server signatures

2023-09-26 Thread David Benjamin
To clarify, I meant that we should apply this to WebRTC *in a separate launch*. This one will just be HTTPS. We don't have numbers or a flag for WebRTC right now, and we usually end up doing WebRTC separately anyway, for better or worse. :-) On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 12:31 PM David Benjamin

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Deprecate TLS SHA-1 server signatures

2023-09-26 Thread David Benjamin
me, I'm >>> not sure how many page loads happen across it. Probably a lot, but it's >>> still dominated by subresources. >>> >>> In practice, the 0.02% bound appears to have shaken out to sub 0.01% >>> (0.009%), determined by looking at d

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: TLS Encrypted Client Hello (ECH)

2023-09-20 Thread David Benjamin
> /Daniel > On 2023-09-19 01:04, 'David Adrian' via blink-dev wrote: > > > Could we please request a signal? > > Done (and positive!). I had forgotten to add it to Chrome Status. > https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/46 > > As for the explain

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Deprecate TLS SHA-1 server signatures

2023-09-19 Thread David Benjamin
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 1:50 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 7:45 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 1:35 AM 'Jeffrey Yasskin' via blink-dev < >> blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 4:11 PM David Adrian wrote: >>> > This should probab

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: TLS Encrypted Client Hello (ECH)

2023-09-18 Thread David Benjamin
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 10:06 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 5:35 PM David Benjamin > wrote: > >> On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 1:12 AM Yoav Weiss >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 10:05 PM Mike Taylor

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: TLS Encrypted Client Hello (ECH)

2023-09-16 Thread David Benjamin
On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 1:12 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 10:05 PM Mike Taylor > wrote: > >> On 9/11/23 6:34 PM, 'David Adrian' via blink-dev wrote: >> >> Contact emails david...@chromium.org, dadr...@google.com >> >> Explainer None >> >> I think a short explainer that outl

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: X25519Kyber768 key encapsulation for TLS

2023-09-08 Thread David Benjamin
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 4:16 PM 'David Adrian' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > > LGTM to experiment from M117 - M118 inclusive. I think that's what > you're asking for - please let me know if I'm reading this incorrectly. > Good luck! > > Thank you! > > > Any pointers to learn more

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: RFC 7616 Digest auth: Support SHA-256, SHA-512-256 and user hashing

2023-06-26 Thread David Benjamin
it worth flag-protecting.) On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:46 AM Rick Byers wrote: > Hi Deomid, > Thanks for the contribution! Do you know if chromium has any metrics on > how common digest auth is? I took a quick look and didn't find one myself. > +David > Benjamin also. Technica

Re: [blink-dev] Ready for Trial: Deprecate TLS SHA-1 server signatures

2023-06-08 Thread David Benjamin
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 1:18 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 7:15 PM 'David Adrian' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Contact emailsdadr...@google.com >> >> ExplainerNone >> >> Specificationhttps://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9155.html >> >> Summary >> >> Chrome

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: TLS Encrypted Client Hello (ECH)

2022-08-23 Thread David Benjamin
(Sorry for the late reply. Was out sick for a bit.) On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 4:06 PM Mike West wrote: > I'm excited to see this! One question inline about timelines: > > On Thursday, August 11, 2022 at 9:55:48 PM UTC+2 David Benjamin wrote: > >> Contact emailsda

[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: TLS Encrypted Client Hello (ECH)

2022-08-11 Thread David Benjamin
Contact emailsdavid...@chromium.org, dadr...@google.com ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tls-esni Summary The TLS Encrypted ClientHello (ECH) extension enables clients to encrypt ClientHello messages, which are normally sent in cleartext, under a serve

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: TLS ALPN extension in wss-schemed WebSockets connections

2022-01-20 Thread David Benjamin
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 12:22 AM Mike Taylor > wrote: > >> LGTM1, thanks for improving interop here. >> >> On 1/19/22 3:22 PM, David Benjamin wrote: >> >> Contact emails david...@chromium.org >> >> Specification https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/htm

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: TLS ALPN extension in wss-schemed WebSockets connections

2022-01-19 Thread David Benjamin
Contact emailsdavid...@chromium.org Specificationhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7301 Summary This is a PSA about a small tweak to an existing feature. The change is to include the TLS ALPN extension when initiating a new connection for wss-schemed WebSockets, offering just the default

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate: TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1

2021-10-27 Thread David Benjamin
specifically, though I've seen it happen on > Windows too. > > Claire - what version of your operating system are you running? > > Cheers, > -slade > > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:50 AM David Benjamin > wrote: > >> Google servers have lon

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate: TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1

2021-10-27 Thread David Benjamin
y, October 17, 2018 at 5:15:10 AM UTC+8 David Benjamin wrote: > >> (This was announced as a blog post >> <https://security.googleblog.com/2018/10/modernizing-transport-security.html> >> yesterday.) >> >> Primary eng (and PM) emails >> >> davi...@chrom