Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Deprecation Trial: Removal of X-Requested-With in WebView

Thank you all for the LGTMs Sincerely, [image: Google Logo] Peter Birk Pakkenberg Software Engineer pb...@chromium.org On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 at 19:58, Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM3 > On 4/4/24 10:24 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: > > LGTM2 to continue the Deprecation Trial until M138. > > Thanks fo

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Deprecation Trial: Removal of X-Requested-With in WebView

LGTM3 On 4/4/24 10:24 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM2 to continue the Deprecation Trial until M138. Thanks for pushing this through! It'd be great if by the time this trial expires we'd have a clearer picture of the required replacement mechanisms and some momentum for moving trial par

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Deprecation Trial: Removal of X-Requested-With in WebView

LGTM2 to continue the Deprecation Trial until M138. Thanks for pushing this through! It'd be great if by the time this trial expires we'd have a clearer picture of the required replacement mechanisms and some momentum for moving trial participants off to them. On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 3:21 PM Peter

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Deprecation Trial: Removal of X-Requested-With in WebView

Hi Yoav, The X-Requested-With header exposes the app package name of the embedding application on all HTTP requests made from WebView. The header value is not signed, and can be changed either by web content loaded in the WebView, or by the host app, through various well known methods. Media cont

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Deprecation Trial: Removal of X-Requested-With in WebView

On Thursday, March 28, 2024 at 12:53:04 PM UTC+1 Peter Pakkenberg wrote: Hi Yoav, A number of large websites are working on adopting the new WebView Media Integrity API as an alternative Can you elaborate on the connection between the two? Are there overlapping use cases? I guess I'm missin

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Deprecation Trial: Removal of X-Requested-With in WebView

Hi Yoav, A number of large websites are working on adopting the new WebView Media Integrity API as an alternative, however, that said, other websites have expressed hesitancy to move away from using the header, citing the lack of alternative signals that solve their more precise use cases. Lookin

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Deprecation Trial: Removal of X-Requested-With in WebView

Of the 100+ origins that signed up for the trial, do you know if any made progress towards reducing their dependence on this header? Any that no longer need the trial? On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 5:03 PM Daniel Bratell wrote: > This being beyond the normal scope of an extension will require three >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Deprecation Trial: Removal of X-Requested-With in WebView

This being beyond the normal scope of an extension will require three LGTMS so here is the first one: LGTM1 I appreciate that it's not optimal in any way to have something like this running this long, but I sympathize with the end result and understand that App developers can need both longer

[blink-dev] Intent to Extend Deprecation Trial: Removal of X-Requested-With in WebView

Hello Blink-dev. I would like to extend the ‘X-Requested-With in WebView Deprecation’ trial until M138 in line with the premise made below in the Summary below. I am asking for an extension of 12 milestones instead of the customary 6