Re: [EXTERNAL] [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS anchor positioning remembered scroll offset

Sorry, redundant email. You have 3 LGTMs. On Wed, Mar 12, 2025, 7:52 AM Chris Harrelson wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2025, 11:34 AM 'Alex Russell' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > >> LGTM1 >> >> On Wednesday, March 5, 2025 at 11:47:20 PM UTC-8 Morten Stenshorne wrote: >>

Re: [EXTERNAL] [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS anchor positioning remembered scroll offset

LGTM2 On Mon, Mar 10, 2025, 11:34 AM 'Alex Russell' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > LGTM1 > > On Wednesday, March 5, 2025 at 11:47:20 PM UTC-8 Morten Stenshorne wrote: > >> Daniel Clark writes: >> >> > Can you remind me what the current behavior is without the remembered >> > sc

Re: [EXTERNAL] [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS anchor positioning remembered scroll offset

LGTM1 On Wednesday, March 5, 2025 at 11:47:20 PM UTC-8 Morten Stenshorne wrote: > Daniel Clark writes: > > > Can you remind me what the current behavior is without the remembered > > scroll offset? I am wondering if there’s any scenario where changing > > this could break existing anchor pos usa

Re: [EXTERNAL] [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS anchor positioning remembered scroll offset

Thanks! LGTM1. On Wednesday, March 5, 2025 at 11:47:20 PM UTC-8 mste...@chromium.org wrote: > Daniel Clark writes: > > > Can you remind me what the current behavior is without the remembered > > scroll offset? I am wondering if there’s any scenario where changing > > this could break existing an

Re: [EXTERNAL] [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS anchor positioning remembered scroll offset

LGTM2 On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 11:29 AM 'Dan Clark' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Thanks! LGTM1. > > On Wednesday, March 5, 2025 at 11:47:20 PM UTC-8 mste...@chromium.org > wrote: > >> Daniel Clark writes: >> >> > Can you remind me what the current behavior is without the remem

Re: [EXTERNAL] [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS anchor positioning remembered scroll offset

Daniel Clark writes: > Can you remind me what the current behavior is without the remembered > scroll offset? I am wondering if there’s any scenario where changing > this could break existing anchor pos usage. Without this the inset-modified containing block for `position-area` doesn't take the

RE: [EXTERNAL] [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS anchor positioning remembered scroll offset

ndroid, and Android WebView)? > No Any reason this can't ship on all platforms? -- Dan From: Morten Stenshorne Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2025 11:41 PM To: blink-dev Subject: [EXTERNAL] [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS anchor positioning remembered scroll offset Contact emails msten...@chromi

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS anchor positioning remembered scroll offset

Contact emailsmsten...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#scroll Summary Add support for the concept of "remembered scroll offset" - see https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#scroll When a positioned element has a default anchor, an