On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 9:03 PM Evan Stade wrote:
> Thanks all!
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 5:10 AM Philip Jägenstedt
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Evan,
>>
>> Thanks for looking into this, and for answering some of my questions
>> off-list. To summarize, eviction is spec'd very loosely and a testdriver.js
Thanks all!
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 5:10 AM Philip Jägenstedt
wrote:
> Hi Evan,
>
> Thanks for looking into this, and for answering some of my questions
> off-list. To summarize, eviction is spec'd very loosely and a testdriver.js
> API could probably only be "evict everything" or "evict data
LGTM3
On 12/13/23 11:04 AM, Rick Byers wrote:
LGTM2
+1 to raising the bar on test automation, but only in the cases where
there aren't unreasonable burdens and there is clear significant test
coverage value (i.e., not this specific case). Thanks for the analysis
Evan and Philip!
On Wed,
LGTM2
+1 to raising the bar on test automation, but only in the cases where there
aren't unreasonable burdens and there is clear significant test coverage
value (i.e., not this specific case). Thanks for the analysis Evan and
Philip!
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 8:10 AM Philip Jägenstedt
wrote:
>
Hi Evan,
Thanks for looking into this, and for answering some of my questions
off-list. To summarize, eviction is spec'd very loosely and a testdriver.js
API could probably only be "evict everything" or "evict data in this
bucket". Neither of those would test the interesting parts of how quota,
Hi Philip,
After conferring with the team, we feel that there is an appropriate
distribution of coverage provided by WPT and Chromium unit and browser
tests. Leveraging testdriver for one-off hooks such as this would introduce
substantial test-only code flows, diminishing the confidence that the
Thanks Evan for listing out the tests, they were more spread out than I
thought. Great to see more of the tests being upstreamed too!
I wonder if we can do even better and test eviction however? Have you
looked into defining a WebDriver endpoint for triggering eviction? It could
make sense in
Hi Philip,
Here is a comprehensive list of web tests that verify storageBuckets
behavior. We do feel the size of this list aligns well with the spec,
which is fairly concise. As you can see, some are spread out in directories
for the other storage APIs that storageBuckets brokers.
That said, not
Hi Evan,
Is
https://wpt.fyi/results/storage/buckets?label=experimental=master
the full set of tests? Given the size of the spec, does that cover the
whole feature well?
Best regards,
Philip
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 5:58 PM Evan Stade wrote:
> [reply-all this time]
>
> Hi Philip,
>
> thanks for
[reply-all this time]
Hi Philip,
thanks for pointing out those two oversights. I have fixed the checkboxes
on the chromestatus entry. It is in fact tested by WPT and supported on all
Blink platforms.
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 8:43 AM Philip Jägenstedt
wrote:
> Hi Evan,
>
> A few questions
Hi Evan,
A few questions inline.
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 9:38 PM Evan Stade wrote:
>
> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
> Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>
> No
>
Which platform will this not be supported on?
> Is this feature fully
Contact emails
est...@chromium.org, a...@chromium.org, ajayrahate...@chromium.org
Explainer
https://github.com/WICG/storage-buckets/blob/main/explainer.md
Specification
https://wicg.github.io/storage-buckets
Summary
Storage Buckets gives sites the ability to organize on-device data into
12 matches
Mail list logo
