Thanks Mike!
Once the spec gets sorted out I can add the additional WPT tests.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 8:44 AM Mike Taylor wrote:
> LGTM2 - it would be great to add additional tests as mentioned.
> On 8/21/24 5:43 PM, Alex Russell wrote:
>
> LGTM1; thanks for the detailed responses to Domenic.
Thanks Alex!
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 8:43 AM Alex Russell
wrote:
> LGTM1; thanks for the detailed responses to Domenic.
>
> On Sunday, August 18, 2024 at 10:30:50 PM UTC-7 Traian Captan wrote:
>
>> This relates to the interoperability issues discussed below. You say
>>> "This change increases i
(Unnecessary) LGTM4. Thanks to all your detailed answers, I think the
compat and interop risk is low, and am excited to see this ship.
If you or your team has time to follow up
on https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/10569 to finish the spec and tests
story, that would be a great help.
On Thu
LGTM3
/Daniel
On 2024-08-21 17:44, Mike Taylor wrote:
LGTM2 - it would be great to add additional tests as mentioned.
On 8/21/24 5:43 PM, Alex Russell wrote:
LGTM1; thanks for the detailed responses to Domenic.
On Sunday, August 18, 2024 at 10:30:50 PM UTC-7 Traian Captan wrote:
Th
LGTM2 - it would be great to add additional tests as mentioned.
On 8/21/24 5:43 PM, Alex Russell wrote:
LGTM1; thanks for the detailed responses to Domenic.
On Sunday, August 18, 2024 at 10:30:50 PM UTC-7 Traian Captan wrote:
This relates to the interoperability issues discussed below.
LGTM1; thanks for the detailed responses to Domenic.
On Sunday, August 18, 2024 at 10:30:50 PM UTC-7 Traian Captan wrote:
> This relates to the interoperability issues discussed below. You say "This
>> change increases interop with Safari and Firefox which already provide a
>> reasonable fallba
>
> This relates to the interoperability issues discussed below. You say "This
> change increases interop with Safari and Firefox which already provide a
> reasonable fallback style for elements with `appearance: none`,"
> but don't give detail on whether our "reasonable fallback style" is the
> s
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 6:07 PM Traian Captan wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 10:51 PM Domenic Denicola
> wrote:
>
>> SpecificationNone
>>>
>>
>> My understanding is that appearance: none has a specification, probably
>> around https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui/#appearance-switching . Can you
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 10:51 PM Domenic Denicola
wrote:
> SpecificationNone
>>
>
> My understanding is that appearance: none has a specification, probably
> around https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui/#appearance-switching . Can you
> ensure this field is filled out, and more importantly, that the
>
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 6:05 AM Traian Captan wrote:
> Contact emailstcap...@chromium.org
>
> ExplainerNone
>
> SpecificationNone
>
My understanding is that appearance: none has a specification, probably
around https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui/#appearance-switching . Can you
ensure this field is
Contact emailstcap...@chromium.org
ExplainerNone
SpecificationNone
Summary
With this change elements with `appearance: none` will have a
reasonable fallback style that matches Safari and Firefox instead of just
disappearing from the page. As well developers will be able to custom style
the el
11 matches
Mail list logo
