Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: MP4 container support for MediaRecorder

LGTM3 (Mozilla has responded that they think this makes sense) /Daniel On 2024-03-06 22:02, 'Sunggook Chue' via blink-dev wrote: Request for Mozilla: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/996. Yes, the new feature already works on Safari. On Wednesday, March 6, 2024 at

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: MP4 container support for MediaRecorder

Request for Mozilla: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/996. Yes, the new feature already works on Safari. On Wednesday, March 6, 2024 at 8:53:12 AM UTC-8 mike...@chromium.org wrote: > We met today and discussed this intent as OWNERS, and would like you to > still request

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: MP4 container support for MediaRecorder

We met today and discussed this intent as OWNERS, and would like you to still request a vendor position from Mozilla (as I requested earlier). If this change doesn't result in interop with Safari, can you also file a vendor position for them? My read of the explainer is that we should be

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: MP4 container support for MediaRecorder

LGTM3 At a higher level, it would be great for AV1/VP9 encode to end up in something like Interop. It makes me sad to be adding a vote here to enable a closed format when open ones are better. On Wednesday, March 6, 2024 at 8:43:11 AM UTC-8 Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > LGTM2 > > I think that >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: MP4 container support for MediaRecorder

LGTM2 I think that https://wpt.fyi/results/mediacapture-record?label=master=experimental=mp4 are the relevant tests. LGTM assuming all of these tests pass with MediaRecorderEnableMp4Muxer enabled. If that's not the case, is there some functionality that won't be supported initially? On Wed, Mar

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: MP4 container support for MediaRecorder

LGTM1 On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 5:01 PM 'Michaela Merz' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Thank you for adding this. Finally we're going to be able to do > cross-browser video-recordings and playing. Can't wait to see it in > production. > > M. > > > On Monday, March 4, 2024 at

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: MP4 container support for MediaRecorder

Thank you for adding this. Finally we're going to be able to do cross-browser video-recordings and playing. Can't wait to see it in production. M. On Monday, March 4, 2024 at 3:50:13 PM UTC-7 sun...@microsoft.com wrote: > Mike, I've added feature detection and developer engagement on >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: MP4 container support for MediaRecorder

Mike, I've added feature detection and developer engagement on https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WV795DHY3Jf2p_htuAKZ9DXUefiGdQs29mCb8vRiHt8/edit?usp=sharing. On Monday, March 4, 2024 at 2:13:11 PM UTC-8 Sunggook Chue wrote: > Yoav, > > Philipp's answer is correct, please let me know if you

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: MP4 container support for MediaRecorder

Yoav, Philipp's answer is correct, please let me know if you need any more info to unblock. On Thursday, February 29, 2024 at 11:53:47 AM UTC-8 philipp...@googlemail.com wrote: > Yoav, > > in WebRTC land "we have a sample for that" (thanks to the one and only > WebRTC devrel guy Sam Dutton,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: MP4 container support for MediaRecorder

Yoav, in WebRTC land "we have a sample for that" (thanks to the one and only WebRTC devrel guy Sam Dutton, I think I stole this tagline from him)! https://webrtc.github.io/samples/src/content/getusermedia/record/ with recent changes to improve MP4 support. Discovery currently happens with

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: MP4 container support for MediaRecorder

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 1:46 AM 'Sunggook Chue' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Here is an explainer, summary only. > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WV795DHY3Jf2p_htuAKZ9DXUefiGdQs29mCb8vRiHt8/edit?usp=sharing Thanks! That's very useful! :) What's the feature

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: MP4 container support for MediaRecorder

Safari's "choice" of containers and codecs has basically led to a situation where there was no interoperable way to record a video using MediaRecorder that could be played in other browsers? Am Do., 29. Feb. 2024 um 01:46 Uhr schrieb 'Sunggook Chue' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org>: >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: MP4 container support for MediaRecorder

Here is an explainer, summary only. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WV795DHY3Jf2p_htuAKZ9DXUefiGdQs29mCb8vRiHt8/edit?usp=sharing On Wednesday, February 28, 2024 at 7:53:29 AM UTC-8 yoav...@chromium.org wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 1:45 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > >> >> On 2/22/24 9:21 PM,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: MP4 container support for MediaRecorder

On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 1:45 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > > On 2/22/24 9:21 PM, 'Sunggook Chue' via blink-dev wrote: > > Contact emails > > sung...@microsoft.com > > dalecur...@chromium.com (reviewer and mentor). > > Explainer > > https://www.w3.org/TR/mediastream-recording/ > > That's not an

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: MP4 container support for MediaRecorder

On 2/22/24 9:21 PM, 'Sunggook Chue' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails sung...@microsoft.com dalecur...@chromium.com (reviewer and mentor). Explainer https://www.w3.org/TR/mediastream-recording/ Specification

[blink-dev] Intent to ship: MP4 container support for MediaRecorder

Contact emails sung...@microsoft.com dalecur...@chromium.com (reviewer and mentor). Explainer https://www.w3.org/TR/mediastream-recording/ Specification https://www.w3.org/TR/mediastream-recording/ Summary Adds support for muxing audio/video into MP4 containers with MediaRecorder.