LGTM3
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 11:13 AM Mike West wrote:
> I agree with Rick's analysis here. Given the purely-negative nature of
> this OT, there's little risk in this burning-in unless we ship it, in which
> case we want it to burn in. Dropping the usage limitation for this OT
> LGTM2.
>
>
I agree with Rick's analysis here. Given the purely-negative nature of this
OT, there's little risk in this burning-in unless we ship it, in which case
we want it to burn in. Dropping the usage limitation for this OT LGTM2.
-mike
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 7:34 PM Mike Taylor wrote:
> On
As I understand it, this OT is entirely about taking away functionality
(grants nothing new which a site might take a dependency on). Therefore I
don't think the usage limits are providing much, if any, value. At the same
time, I can see the value of being able to test this upcoming behavior at a
Hi Mike,
Nir from Meta and Noah's peer.
would it be possible to give an estimate or a guideline on the permissible
magnitude of usage for the Opt-In trial (the one that forces the full
reduction of the UserAgent) available?
As we would like to conduct an experiment on that, and not deviate
Are there any plans to extend this Origin Trial? We (Meta) are considering
using it to test the impact of UA reduction, but just noticed that its "end
date" is tomorrow, and was marked with availability ending after version
103.
On Thursday, October 14, 2021 at 5:29:45 PM UTC-4
Just an FYI, the blog post has been updated to give instructions on how to
participate in the User-Agent Reduction Origin Trial as a third-party
embed:
https://developer.chrome.com/blog/user-agent-reduction-origin-trial/#how-to-participate-in-the-origin-trial-as-a-third-party-embed
On Tue, Sep
A blog post just went out for this OT:
https://developer.chrome.com/blog/user-agent-reduction-origin-trial/
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 9:47 AM Ali Beyad wrote:
> An update on this: it will be too rushed to get the User-Agent Reduction
> OT into the M94 branch cutoff (this Thursday), so we moved
