Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Captured Surface Control

2025-03-24 Thread Chris Harrelson
LGTM3 On Mon, Mar 24, 2025, 7:32 PM Domenic Denicola wrote: > LGTM2, since you are sure future changes will be compatible. And I agree > with Alex; the OT feedback is very persuasive that this API serves web > developers. > > On Tuesday, March 25, 2025 at 3:22:12 AM UTC+9 Alex Russell wrote: > >

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Captured Surface Control

2025-03-24 Thread Domenic Denicola
LGTM2, since you are sure future changes will be compatible. And I agree with Alex; the OT feedback is very persuasive that this API serves web developers. On Tuesday, March 25, 2025 at 3:22:12 AM UTC+9 Alex Russell wrote: > Thanks for all the context, Elad. Evidence from OT is persuasive here.

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Captured Surface Control

2025-03-24 Thread Alex Russell
Thanks for all the context, Elad. Evidence from OT is persuasive here. LGTM1. On Monday, March 24, 2025 at 2:05:50 AM UTC-7 elad...@google.com wrote: > The remaining open issues are: > >1. > >Whether the API shape should already support gestures other than >wheel, or whether su

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Captured Surface Control

2025-03-24 Thread 'Elad Alon' via blink-dev
The remaining open issues are: 1. Whether the API shape should already support gestures other than wheel, or whether such a future extension should only be addressed in the future. 2. Whether the API should allow concurrent forwarding events from multiple source elements or jus