Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Increased max nesting level for setTimeout(0)

2022-10-27 Thread Etienne Pierre-doray
> > Sounds good - should we consider this Intent withdrawn for now? > Yes, let's drop this for now and maybe revisit when I have numbers. On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 12:36 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > Sounds good - should we consider this Intent withdrawn for now? > > On 10/24/22 10:05 AM, Etienne

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Increased max nesting level for setTimeout(0)

2022-10-26 Thread Mike Taylor
Sounds good - should we consider this Intent withdrawn for now? On 10/24/22 10:05 AM, Etienne Pierre-doray wrote: 2.1 is the new version. We can ignore 2.0. I suppose this doesn't need to be released on M108 then. I'll keep experimenting. On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 4:36 PM Hannes Payer

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Increased max nesting level for setTimeout(0)

2022-10-24 Thread Etienne Pierre-doray
> > 2.1 is the new version. We can ignore 2.0. > I suppose this doesn't need to be released on M108 then. I'll keep experimenting. On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 4:36 PM Hannes Payer wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 12:31 PM Etienne Pierre-doray < > etien...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Is that a

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Increased max nesting level for setTimeout(0)

2022-10-21 Thread 'Hannes Payer' via blink-dev
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 12:31 PM Etienne Pierre-doray wrote: > Is that a very new change? Is there a reason for us to continue to look at >> (or cite) 2.0 when 2.1 is live? >> > I think that happened in August. sky@ or +hpayer@ might be able to answer > this. > 2.1 is the new version. We can

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Increased max nesting level for setTimeout(0)

2022-10-21 Thread Etienne Pierre-doray
> > Is that a very new change? Is there a reason for us to continue to look at > (or cite) 2.0 when 2.1 is live? > I think that happened in August. sky@ or +hpayer@ might be able to answer this. What's the residual delta now that 2.1 is available to test against? > Measured on Canary MacBook pro

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Increased max nesting level for setTimeout(0)

2022-10-20 Thread Alex Russell
Thanks Etienne; questions inline: On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 8:04:19 AM UTC-7 Etienne Pierre-doray wrote: > Thanks for taking the time to discuss this. > > I'm wondering if we understand the constituent test in Speedometer (or the >> harness) that is favouring Safari's out-of-spec

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Increased max nesting level for setTimeout(0)

2022-10-20 Thread Etienne Pierre-doray
Thanks for taking the time to discuss this. I'm wondering if we understand the constituent test in Speedometer (or the > harness) that is favouring Safari's out-of-spec behaviour? > There's some context in crbug.com/1297550 and in speedometer2.1 release notes

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Increased max nesting level for setTimeout(0)

2022-10-19 Thread Alex Russell
This intent was the subject of a long discussion at API OWNERS today, and I'm wondering if we understand the constituent test in Speedometer (or the harness) that is favouring Safari's out-of-spec behaviour? Speedometer seems like the key motivator here, rather than public content, and