Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: ScrollIntoView container option

2025-09-23 Thread Jacob “kurtextrem” G
Small ping, it's been some time (maybe my response went into the spam folder or something). I still wonder how to best feature detect it? Jacob G schrieb am Montag, 28. Juli 2025 um 13:47:21 UTC+2: > I'm not sure if I'm 'allowed' to ask in this mailing list (I'm not an API > owner or anything -

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: ScrollIntoView container option

2025-07-28 Thread Jacob “kurtextrem” G
I'm not sure if I'm 'allowed' to ask in this mailing list (I'm not an API owner or anything - just a curious web dev), but: I really love this new option, as scrollIntoView's scroll hijacking behavior has bitten me in the past too (so I also think this solves a real big problem of the web platf

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: ScrollIntoView container option

2025-07-04 Thread Jeffrey Yasskin
Thanks! On Fri, Jul 4, 2025, 7:49 AM Robert Flack wrote: > Thanks, I added an example to the spec with rationale of why you might use > this: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/12450. > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 11:27 AM Daniel Bratell > wrote: > >> LGTM3 (there are two LGTM1 so next is 3)

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: ScrollIntoView container option

2025-07-04 Thread Robert Flack
Thanks, I added an example to the spec with rationale of why you might use this: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/12450. On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 11:27 AM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM3 (there are two LGTM1 so next is 3). Note Alex' request. > > /Daniel > On 2025-07-02 17:26, Alex Russell w

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: ScrollIntoView container option

2025-07-02 Thread Daniel Bratell
LGTM3 (there are two LGTM1 so next is 3). Note Alex' request. /Daniel On 2025-07-02 17:26, Alex Russell wrote: Per conversation at today's API OWNERS, LGTM1 contingent on there being a stand-alone explainer and example code. Bonus points for getting motivating example code into the spec too.

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: ScrollIntoView container option

2025-07-02 Thread Alex Russell
Per conversation at today's API OWNERS, LGTM1 contingent on there being a stand-alone explainer and example code. Bonus points for getting motivating example code into the spec too. Best, Alex On Wednesday, June 25, 2025 at 1:20:00 PM UTC-7 Robert Flack wrote: > I've updated the chromestatus

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: ScrollIntoView container option

2025-07-02 Thread Yoav Weiss (@Shopify)
LGTM1 On Wednesday, June 25, 2025 at 10:20:00 PM UTC+2 Robert Flack wrote: > I've updated the chromestatus motivation to include a rough example of > what developers do today compared to what this API enables. In particular, > without this API developers building carousel components need to cal

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: ScrollIntoView container option

2025-06-25 Thread Robert Flack
I've updated the chromestatus motivation to include a rough example of what developers do today compared to what this API enables. In particular, without this API developers building carousel components need to calculate the scroll offset to bring a particular slide into view and then call scrollTo

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: ScrollIntoView container option

2025-06-25 Thread Alex Russell
Is there an explainer or a motivating example anywhere? Best, Alex On Thursday, June 19, 2025 at 9:24:22 AM UTC-7 Chromestatus wrote: > Contact emails fla...@chromium.org > > Explainer None > > Specification > https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom-view/#dom-scrollintoviewoptions-container > > Summ