Thanks Mike!
Once the spec gets sorted out I can add the additional WPT tests.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 8:44 AM Mike Taylor wrote:
> LGTM2 - it would be great to add additional tests as mentioned.
> On 8/21/24 5:43 PM, Alex Russell wrote:
>
> LGTM1; thanks for the detailed responses to Domenic.
Thanks Alex!
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 8:43 AM Alex Russell
wrote:
> LGTM1; thanks for the detailed responses to Domenic.
>
> On Sunday, August 18, 2024 at 10:30:50 PM UTC-7 Traian Captan wrote:
>
>> This relates to the interoperability issues discussed below. You say
>>> "This change increases i
(Unnecessary) LGTM4. Thanks to all your detailed answers, I think the
compat and interop risk is low, and am excited to see this ship.
If you or your team has time to follow up
on https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/10569 to finish the spec and tests
story, that would be a great help.
On Thu
LGTM3
/Daniel
On 2024-08-21 17:44, Mike Taylor wrote:
LGTM2 - it would be great to add additional tests as mentioned.
On 8/21/24 5:43 PM, Alex Russell wrote:
LGTM1; thanks for the detailed responses to Domenic.
On Sunday, August 18, 2024 at 10:30:50 PM UTC-7 Traian Captan wrote:
Th
LGTM2 - it would be great to add additional tests as mentioned.
On 8/21/24 5:43 PM, Alex Russell wrote:
LGTM1; thanks for the detailed responses to Domenic.
On Sunday, August 18, 2024 at 10:30:50 PM UTC-7 Traian Captan wrote:
This relates to the interoperability issues discussed below.
LGTM1; thanks for the detailed responses to Domenic.
On Sunday, August 18, 2024 at 10:30:50 PM UTC-7 Traian Captan wrote:
> This relates to the interoperability issues discussed below. You say "This
>> change increases interop with Safari and Firefox which already provide a
>> reasonable fallba
>
> This relates to the interoperability issues discussed below. You say "This
> change increases interop with Safari and Firefox which already provide a
> reasonable fallback style for elements with `appearance: none`,"
> but don't give detail on whether our "reasonable fallback style" is the
> s
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 6:07 PM Traian Captan wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 10:51 PM Domenic Denicola
> wrote:
>
>> SpecificationNone
>>>
>>
>> My understanding is that appearance: none has a specification, probably
>> around https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui/#appearance-switching . Can you
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 10:51 PM Domenic Denicola
wrote:
> SpecificationNone
>>
>
> My understanding is that appearance: none has a specification, probably
> around https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui/#appearance-switching . Can you
> ensure this field is filled out, and more importantly, that the
>
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 6:05 AM Traian Captan wrote:
> Contact emailstcap...@chromium.org
>
> ExplainerNone
>
> SpecificationNone
>
My understanding is that appearance: none has a specification, probably
around https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui/#appearance-switching . Can you
ensure this field is
10 matches
Mail list logo
