LGTM3
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 10:16 AM 'Thomas Steiner' via blink-dev <
blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote:
> As an additional developer signal showing that developers want this,
> there's a polyfill: https://github.com/CarterLi/websocketstream-polyfill.
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 10:10 AM Domenic Deni
As an additional developer signal showing that developers want this,
there's a polyfill: https://github.com/CarterLi/websocketstream-polyfill.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 10:10 AM Domenic Denicola
wrote:
> LGTM2.
>
> I appreciate Adam's careful attention to all portions of the process here,
> and als
LGTM2.
I appreciate Adam's careful attention to all portions of the process here,
and also Alex's probing as to whether we're meeting the developer interest
portion. Although this would be more of a slam-dunk if we were able to get
that partner to comment publicly on their experience, I'm willi
Thanks Alex,
We have a partner who need backpressure to avoid jank in their app. I've
been waiting for them to comment, but it's taking a while.
Adam
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 at 01:53, Alex Russell wrote:
> Hey Adam,
>
> Sorry for the slow follow up. Were there folks beyond the Deno ecosystem
> tha
Hey Adam,
Sorry for the slow follow up. Were there folks beyond the Deno ecosystem
that expressed interest and/or satisfaction with the design? We're need to
make a case in API OWNERS that there's enough developer interest to
surmount the lack of other vendor interest. Are you able to share mor
>
> Any reason the PR for the spec hasn't landed yet?
We don't have interest from a second implementer yet. As far as I know,
Deno doesn't count for this purpose.
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 03:50, Chris Harrelson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any reason the PR for the spec hasn't landed yet?
>
> On Thu, Feb 15
Hi,
Any reason the PR for the spec hasn't landed yet?
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 7:54 AM Mike Taylor wrote:
> Thank you - LGTM1
> On 2/15/24 7:16 AM, Adam Rice wrote:
>
> Thanks Mike,
>
> I have requested the approvals. Sorry for the delay, I didn't understand
> the interface.
>
> Adam
>
> On Thu,
Thank you - LGTM1
On 2/15/24 7:16 AM, Adam Rice wrote:
Thanks Mike,
I have requested the approvals. Sorry for the delay, I didn't
understand the interface.
Adam
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 01:39, Mike Taylor wrote:
Hi Adam,
Would you mind requesting approvals in the chromestatus entry
Thanks Mike,
I have requested the approvals. Sorry for the delay, I didn't understand
the interface.
Adam
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 01:39, Mike Taylor wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> Would you mind requesting approvals in the chromestatus entry for the
> various review gates?
> On 2/8/24 1:30 AM, Adam Rice
Hi Adam,
Would you mind requesting approvals in the chromestatus entry for the
various review gates?
On 2/8/24 1:30 AM, Adam Rice wrote:
Unfortunately, no partners were ready when we did the OT, so there was
no feedback at all. However, we have subsequently received private
feedback that the
10 matches
Mail list logo
