Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: COOP: restrict-properties

Hi API owners! I've discussed this with the Chrome Security Architecture team and since there are still things to iterate on design wise, we're putting this on hold for now. I'll come back to this thread once we have an experiment ready to ship, instead of continuously announcing milestones and pu

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: COOP: restrict-properties

Sounds good, thanks Arthur. On 10/12/22 7:16 AM, 'Arthur Hemery' via blink-dev wrote: Hi API owners! I've discussed this with the Chrome Security Architecture team and since there are still things to iterate on design wise, we're putting this on hold for now. I'll come back to this thread onc

Re: [blink-dev] Debugging compressed pointers in Blink

> > Perhaps we should add a prettyprinter for cppgc::internal::MemberBase > which automatically calls that function? I just added a pretty-printer for (cppgc|blink)::(Weak|Untraced)Member. Any feedback is appreciated! Anton, can you add

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: FedCM (was WebID)

LGTM1 (I appreciate that there are some unique risks here, but I'm confident the team will be able to navigate those) /Daniel On 2022-10-11 23:13, 'Ilya Grigorik' via blink-dev wrote: At Shopify, we've followed progress closely, and I'm really excited to see the i2s! Agree with the analysi

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Last Baseline Item Alignment

The problem with feature detection here happens once in a while, and flex gap is a prominent previous example. But when it's already happened, there's really not much we can do to fix the situation. So I'm very much inclined to LGTM this. But I see some tests

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Last Baseline Item Alignment

The tests failing are due to the skew between a WPT sync, and WPT running against an "older" version of chrome. These tests pass in Chrome Canary. Ian On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 9:02 AM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > The problem with feature detection here happens once in a while, and flex > gap is a

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Private Network Access requests for subresources without proper preflight response

We (Yoav, Philip, MikeT and I) discussed this at the API OWNERS meeting today and we are still not certain about the compatibility situation. The use counters are lower after compensating for likely malicious usage but they are still not quite as low as we'd like them to be. One thing we consi

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: FedCM (was WebID)

LGTM2 On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 9:02 AM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM1 > > (I appreciate that there are some unique risks here, but I'm confident the > team will be able to navigate those) > > /Daniel > On 2022-10-11 23:13, 'Ilya Grigorik' via blink-dev wrote: > > At Shopify, we've followed progres

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: No-Vary-Search support in navigation prefetch cache

Contact emailsdome...@chromium.org, jbro...@chromium.org, liviuti...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://github.com/WICG/nav-speculation/blob/main/no-vary-search.md SpecificationTo be started soon. Summary Enables prefetch to match even if URL query parameters change. The No-Vary-Search HTTP response

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Private Network Access requests for subresources without proper preflight response

Thanks for getting back to us! On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 6:11 PM Daniel Bratell wrote: > We (Yoav, Philip, MikeT and I) discussed this at the API OWNERS meeting > today and we are still not certain about the compatibility situation. The > use counters are lower after compensating for likely malici

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: FedCM (was WebID)

LGTM3 The risk/benefit tradeoff here seems reasonable. Thanks for continuing to work with the community on finding the ideal shape of the solution here. Please recommend IDPs to take anti-self-hosting means to prevent making future changes to this harder than they should be. On Wed, Oct 12, 2022

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebAuthn minPinLength extension

On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 6:51 PM John Bradley wrote: > This seems to still be waiting for implementation. > > Is something holding it up? > > Now that Windows 11 22H2 has been released with CTAP2.1 support we are > getting complaints that it is not working. > > Any ETA on passing the extension? >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Signed HTTP Exchanges (SXG)

Ah, Thanks for the clarification. Claudio. On Wednesday, October 12, 2022 at 1:55:34 AM UTC+1 Kunihiko Sakamoto wrote: > Hello Claudio, > > The flag removed in 107 was for SignedExchangeSubresourcePrefetch ( > https://chromestatus.com/feature/5126805474246656), which is a > sub-feature of SXG.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Last Baseline Item Alignment

Thanks - LGTM1. On 10/12/22 12:04 PM, Ian Kilpatrick wrote: The tests failing are due to the skew between a WPT sync, and WPT running against an "older" version of chrome. These tests pass in Chrome Canary. Ian On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 9:02 AM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: The problem with

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Last Baseline Item Alignment

LGTM2 On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:02 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > Thanks - LGTM1. > > On 10/12/22 12:04 PM, Ian Kilpatrick wrote: > > The tests failing are due to the skew between a WPT sync, and WPT running > against an "older" version of chrome. > > These tests pass in Chrome Canary. > > Ian > > On

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: WebTransport BYOB readers

Hi there, On 10/7/22 8:27 AM, Zhu, Jianjun wrote: Contact emails jianjun@intel.com , ri...@chromium.org , nidhij...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/w3c/webtransport/blo

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Last Baseline Item Alignment

(I can't count... tkent already gave LGTM1 - but you have 3 now) On 10/12/22 2:03 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:02 AM Mike Taylor wrote: Thanks - LGTM1. On 10/12/22 12:04 PM, Ian Kilpatrick wrote: The tests failing are due to the skew between a WP

[blink-dev] Ready for Trial: Declarative PendingBeacon API

Contact emailsm...@chromium.org, fer...@chromium.org, chrome-pending-bea...@google.com Explainerhttps://github.com/WICG/unload-beacon/blob/main/README.md Design docs https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QIFUu6Ne8x0W62RKJSoTtZjSd_bIM2yXZSELxdeuTFo/edit?pli=1 Summary Page Unload Beacon API (a.k.a.

[blink-dev] Re: Ready for Trial: Declarative PendingBeacon API

(Updated contact info)Contact emailsm...@chromium.org, fer...@chromium.org, pending-beacon-experim...@chromium.org On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 12:12 PM Ming-Ying Chung wrote: > > Explainerhttps://github.com/WICG/unload-beacon/blob/main/README.md > > Design docs > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: CSS Initial Letters

Contact emailsyo...@chromium.org, ko...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-inline/#initial-letter-styling Summary Initial letters are large, decorative letters have been used to start new sections of text since before the invention of printing. In fact, their u