> On 29 Aug, 2018, at 2:53 am, David Collier-Brown wrote:
>
> Humans experience delays directly, and so perceive systems with high latency
> as "slow". The proverbial "man on the Clapham omnibus" therefor responds to
> high-latency systems with disgust.
>
> A trained scientist, however, runs
On 2018-08-27 10:12 p.m., Dave Taht wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 6:02 PM Jonathan Morton wrote:
On 28 Aug, 2018, at 3:59 am, Dave Taht wrote:
"Internet congestion control using the power metric: Keep the pipe
just full, but no fuller" is quite a good read (appears to be open
access pdf,
On 2018-08-28 1:07 p.m., Dave Taht wrote:
In looking over the increasingly vast sqm-related deployment, there's
a persistent data point that pops up regarding inbound shaping at high
rates.
We give users a choice - run out of cpu at those rates or do inbound
sqm at a rate their cpu can afford.
Dave, very interesting to hear. In my dataset, I find that non-technical users
respond positively to the benefits of low-latency, even if the speedtest
metrics show much lower numbers than their plan indicates. Stuff happens
quicker, and more consistently, therefore they are happy.
It’s the
In looking over the increasingly vast sqm-related deployment, there's
a persistent data point that pops up regarding inbound shaping at high
rates.
We give users a choice - run out of cpu at those rates or do inbound
sqm at a rate their cpu can afford. A remarkable percentage are
willing to give