Re: [Bloat] known buffer sizes on switches

On Sat, 24 Nov 2018, Dave Taht wrote: https://people.ucsc.edu/~warner/buffer.html Nice resource, thanks. If someone wonders why things look the way they do, so it's all about on-die and off-die memory. Either you use off-die or on-die memory, often SRAM which requires 6 gates per bit. So

[Bloat] known buffer sizes on switches

https://people.ucsc.edu/~warner/buffer.html -- Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-205-9740 ___ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

[Bloat] netflix vs youtube shootout...

https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeRouter/Netflix-uses-the-most-internet-bandwidth-at-home-please-help/m-p/2574554/highlight/false#M229831 I note that since g+ is dying, little things like this I'm tending to post here now. -- Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel:

[Bloat] OT: Is there modern equivalent to "bump"?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bump_(application) -- Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-205-9740 ___ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

Re: [Bloat] one benefit of turning off shaping + fq_codel

> On Nov 23, 2018, at 5:26 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > > Pete Heist writes: > >> Would it be right to say that the biggest opportunity for reducing >> consumption is to avoid shaping, i.e. by adding BQL-like functionality >> to all classes of device drivers > > Shaping outbound with BQL's support