[Bloat] Offtopic to: New board that looks interesting

2020-04-04 Thread Dave Collier-Brown
On 2020-04-04 1:36 p.m., Dave Taht wrote: I've been really frustrated with the state of distributions lately, trying to get any complex thing done has required snaps and docker containers and I really prefer running stuff natively when possible. Various language development groups have run

Re: [Bloat] [Cake] New board that looks interesting

2020-04-04 Thread Dave Taht
I think I'll wait for y'all to try it and report back. I trust my apu2s and I actually kind of like they lack a graphics chip and need to be configured via serial port. In other news I've started testing ubuntu 20.4, which among other things, has wireguard in it. I've been really frustrated with

Re: [Bloat] [Cake] New board that looks interesting

2020-04-04 Thread Aaron Wood
The comparison of chipset performance link (to OpemWRT forums) that went out had this chip, the J4105 as the fastest. Able to do a gigabit with cake (nearly able to do it in both directions). I think this has replaced the apu2 as the board I’m going with as my edge router. On Sat, Apr 4, 2020

Re: [Bloat] [Cake] New board that looks interesting

2020-04-04 Thread Dave Taht
Historically I've found the "Celeron" chips rather weak, but it's just a brand. I haven't the foggiest idea how well this variant will perform. The intel ethernet chips are best of breed in linux, however. It's been my hope that the 211 variant with the timed networking support would show up in

Re: [Bloat] [Cake] New board that looks interesting

2020-04-04 Thread David P. Reed
Thanks! I ordered one just now. In my experience, this company does rather neat stuff. Their XMOS based microphone array (ReSpeaker) is really useful. What's the state of play in Linux/OpenWRT for Intel 9560 capabilities regarding AQM? On Saturday, April 4, 2020 12:12am, "Aaron Wood" said: >