On 2021-08-24, at 20:00, Michael Yartys via Bloat
wrote:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JK3eTGkX6qY
OMG. Among other things, he says:
A cheap Rubidium clock module has a deviation of less than 1 second in 100
million years (that would be 3e-16!) (1).
Because it’s an atomic clock, it sur
On Nov 30, 2019, at 15:32, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>
> There are unfortunate problems with introducing new TCP options, in that some
> overzealous firewalls block traffic which uses them. This would be a
> deployment hazard for SCE, which merely using a spare header flag avoids. So
> instead
>>
The end-to-end argument applies: Ultimately, there needs to be
resequencing at the end anyway, so any reordering in the network would be
a performance optimization. It turns out that keeping packets lying
around in some buffer somewhere in the network just to do reseque
>> The end-to-end argument applies: Ultimately, there needs to be resequencing
>> at the end anyway, so any reordering in the network would be a performance
>> optimization. It turns out that keeping packets lying around in some buffer
>> somewhere in the network just to do resequencing before
On Mar 14, 2019, at 22:43, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>
> if a specific link technology is prone to introduce reordering due to
> retransmit it might as well try to clean up after itself
The end-to-end argument applies: Ultimately, there needs to be resequencing at
the end anyway, so any reorde
