Re: [Bloat] known buffer sizes on switches

2018-12-02 Thread Dave Collier-Brown
On 2018-11-28 11:55 a.m., Dave Taht wrote: > Thank you for that. I do have a long standing dream of a single chip > wifi router, with the lowest SNR possible, and the minimum number of > pins coming off of it. I'd settle for 32MB of (static?) ram on chip as > that has proven sufficient to date to

Re: [Bloat] known buffer sizes on switches

2018-11-28 Thread Dave Taht
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 8:55 AM Dave Taht wrote: > > Bruno George Moraes writes: > > > Nice resource, thanks. > > > > If someone wonders why things look the way they do, so it's all about > > on-die and off-die memory. Either you use off-die or on-die memory, often > > SRAM which requires 6

Re: [Bloat] known buffer sizes on switches

2018-11-28 Thread David Collier-Brown
That would be really cool: I loved the Mips we had at YorkU.ca --dave On 2018-11-28 2:02 p.m., Dave Taht wrote: I really don't know a whole heck of a lot about where mips is going. Certainly they remain strong in the embedded market (I do like the edgerouter X a lot), but as for their current

Re: [Bloat] known buffer sizes on switches

2018-11-28 Thread Dave Taht
I really don't know a whole heck of a lot about where mips is going. Certainly they remain strong in the embedded market (I do like the edgerouter X a lot), but as for their current direction or future product lines, not a clue. I used to know someone over there, maybe he's restored new

Re: [Bloat] known buffer sizes on switches

2018-11-28 Thread David Collier-Brown
On 2018-11-28 11:55 a.m., Dave Taht wrote: Thank you for that. I do have a long standing dream of a single chip wifi router, with the lowest SNR possible, and the minimum number of pins coming off of it. I'd settle for 32MB of (static?) ram on chip as that has proven sufficient to date to drive

Re: [Bloat] known buffer sizes on switches

2018-11-28 Thread Dave Taht
Bruno George Moraes writes: > Nice resource, thanks. > > If someone wonders why things look the way they do, so it's all about > on-die and off-die memory. Either you use off-die or on-die memory, often > SRAM which requires 6 gates per bit. So spending half a billion gates > gives you

[Bloat] known buffer sizes on switches

2018-11-28 Thread Bruno George Moraes
> > Nice resource, thanks. > > If someone wonders why things look the way they do, so it's all about > on-die and off-die memory. Either you use off-die or on-die memory, often > SRAM which requires 6 gates per bit. So spending half a billion gates > gives you ~10MB buffer on-die. If you're doing

Re: [Bloat] known buffer sizes on switches

2018-11-24 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Sat, 24 Nov 2018, Dave Taht wrote: https://people.ucsc.edu/~warner/buffer.html Nice resource, thanks. If someone wonders why things look the way they do, so it's all about on-die and off-die memory. Either you use off-die or on-die memory, often SRAM which requires 6 gates per bit. So

[Bloat] known buffer sizes on switches

2018-11-24 Thread Dave Taht
https://people.ucsc.edu/~warner/buffer.html -- Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-205-9740 ___ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat