Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <t...@toke.dk> writes: > Luca Muscariello <luca.muscarie...@gmail.com> writes: > >> This procedure would allow to size FQ_codel but also SFQ. >> It would be interesting to compare the two under this buffer sizing. >> It would also be interesting to compare another mechanism that we have >> mentioned during the defense >> which is AFD + a sparse flow queue. Which is, BTW, already available in >> Cisco nexus switches for data centres. > > One think I wondered about afterwards was whether or not it would be > feasible (as in, easy to add, or maybe even supported in current > versions) to tie in an AQM to an AFD-type virtual fairness queueing > system? You could keep the AQM state variables along with the per-flow > state and react appropriately. Any reason why this wouldn't work?
Just bookmarking this thought for now. _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
