>
> The CPE side has met willingness to investigate these issues from early
> on, but it seems that buffer handling is much harder on CPE chipsets
> than on base station chipsets. In particular on 5G. We have had some
> very good results on 4G, but they do not translate to 5G.
>
My own
Fra: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
> > I really appreciate that you are reaching out to the bufferbloat community
> > for this real-life 5G mobile testing. Lets all help out Erik.
>
> Yes! FYI, I've been communicating off-list with Erik for quite some
> time,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer writes:
> Hi Erik,
>
> I really appreciate that you are reaching out to the bufferbloat community
> for this real-life 5G mobile testing. Lets all help out Erik.
Yes! FYI, I've been communicating off-list with Erik for quite some
time, he's doing great work but fighting
mplete a curl download of x file
> size", using a apache webserver running bbr.
>
>
> -Erik
>
>
>
> Fra: Luca Muscariello
> Sendt: 19. november 2020 14:32
> Til: Taraldsen Erik
> Kopi: Jesper Dangaard Brouer; priyar...@google.
>
> Fra: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> Sendt: 17. november 2020 16:07
> Til: Taraldsen Erik; Priyaranjan Jha
> Kopi: bro...@redhat.com; ncardw...@google.com; bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> Emne: Re: [Bloat] BBR implementations, knobs to tu
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 10:05:24 + wrote:
> Thank you for the response Neal
Yes. And it is impressive how many highly qualified people are on the
bufferbloat list.
> old_hw # uname -r
> 5.3.0-64-generic
> (Ubuntu 19.10 on xenon workstation, integrated network card, 1Gbit
> GPON access. Used
A couple questions:
- I guess this is Linux TCP BBRv1 ("bbr" module)? What's the OS
distribution and exact kernel version ("uname -r")?
- What do you mean when you say "The old server allows for more
re-transmits"?
- If BBRv1 is suffering throughput problems due to high retransmit rates,
then
I'm in the process of replacing a throughput test server. The old server is
running a 1Gbit Ethernet card on a 1Gbit link and ubuntu. The new a 10Gbit
card on a 40Gbit link and centos. Both have low load and Xenon processors.
The purpose is for field installers to verify the bandwidth sold
