Re: [Bloat] Of interest: Comcast AQM Paper

2021-08-01 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Sunday, August 01, 2021 9:28 PM + "Livingood, Jason via Bloat" wrote: The "XB3" definitely lacks it - as it's DOCSIS 3.0-based. You may be eligible for a replacement, depending on your speed tier. Take a look at https://customer.xfinity.com/#/devices and see what that says. If that

Re: [Bloat] Of interest: Comcast AQM Paper

2021-08-01 Thread Livingood, Jason via Bloat
On 8/1/21, 16:13, "Bloat on behalf of Kenneth Porter" wrote: > Mine is a TG1682G, which I'm betting lacks PIE. So how do we get an upgrade? The "XB3" definitely lacks it - as it's DOCSIS 3.0-based. You may be eligible for a replacement, depending on your speed tier. Take a look at

Re: [Bloat] Of interest: Comcast AQM Paper

2021-08-01 Thread Livingood, Jason via Bloat
, "starl...@lists.bufferbloat.net" , bloat Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Bloat] Of interest: Comcast AQM Paper If we see that AQM appears to be not functioning as expected for upstream connections on DOCSIS3.1, what's the right avenue for getting that resolved? (and does that only apply to t

Re: [Bloat] Of interest: Comcast AQM Paper

2021-08-01 Thread Livingood, Jason via Bloat
WiFi is a different challenge as you know. In this case it varies depending on the radio chipset vendor and is on my list of things to work on... JL On 7/31/21, 13:50, "Simon Barber" wrote: Awesome to hear that you are turning this on both upstream and downstream. Do you know if the

Re: [Bloat] Of interest: Comcast AQM Paper

2021-08-01 Thread Kenneth Porter
On 7/31/2021 3:55 PM, Neal Cardwell via Bloat wrote: FWIW, from the paper it sounds like not all Comcast cable modems had/have PIE, which enabled the A/B experiment: "10. Latency Measurement Results As explained earlier, for two variants of XB6 cable modem gateway, upstream DOCSIS-PIE AQM was

Re: [Bloat] Of interest: Comcast AQM Paper

2021-08-01 Thread Michael Richardson
Neal Cardwell via Bloat wrote: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 3:27 PM Aaron Wood wrote: >> >> If we see that AQM appears to be not functioning as expected >> for upstream connections on DOCSIS3.1, what's the right avenue >> for getting that resolved? (and does that only apply to

Re: [Bloat] Of interest: Comcast AQM Paper

2021-07-31 Thread Neal Cardwell via Bloat
On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 3:27 PM Aaron Wood wrote: > > If we see that AQM appears to be not functioning as expected > for upstream connections on DOCSIS3.1, what's the right avenue > for getting that resolved? (and does that only apply to the > Comcast-owned, vs. customer-owned, modems?) FWIW,

Re: [Bloat] Of interest: Comcast AQM Paper

2021-07-31 Thread Aaron Wood
If we see that AQM appears to be not functioning as expected for upstream connections on DOCSIS3.1, what's the right avenue for getting that resolved? (and does that only apply to the Comcast-owned, vs. customer-owned, modems?) On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 10:50 AM Simon Barber wrote: > Awesome to

Re: [Bloat] Of interest: Comcast AQM Paper

2021-07-31 Thread Simon Barber
Awesome to hear that you are turning this on both upstream and downstream. Do you know if the wifi stacks in your home routers also have AQM? Simon > On Jul 30, 2021, at 10:28 PM, Livingood, Jason via Bloat > wrote: > > FYI that I will be presenting a lightning talk at the IRTF MAPRG

[Bloat] Of interest: Comcast AQM Paper

2021-07-30 Thread Livingood, Jason via Bloat
FYI that I will be presenting a lightning talk at the IRTF MAPRG meeting today at 17:30 ET (https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/materials/agenda-111-maprg). The talk links to a just-published paper at https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.13968 (click PDF link in upper right of page) that will