On 30/09/2023 14:19, Sebastian Moeller via Bloat wrote:
>
> P.S.: Of course if we look close enough we surely can find corner-cases where
> either the EU regulations or the translation into national law result in less
> desirable outcomes, but "nothing is perfect" and all in all the regulations
On 18/11/2022 13:36, Rich Brown via Bloat wrote:
> Even though the label only specifies "typical latency", I have a sense that
> this is a good step forward.
Shame that the latency has to be specified in Ms (megaseconds) though.
ISPs will feel justified in rounding it down to 0.
Could I suggest that the discussion return to that topic please?
___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
On 21/03/2023 13:31, Sebastian Moeller via Bloat wrote:
(...)
> Noki's proprietary (aka not ITU) @% Gbps PON seems to be abbreviated 25GS-PON.
25GSPON is in fact not proprietary. It was standardised by means of an
MSA (multi-source agreement) rather than through the ITU-T, but it is
standardised
