Re: [BlueObelisk-discuss] help needed -- SMILES and MMFF94 atom types

2012-05-18 Thread Robert Hanson
follow-up on this. Over the last few days I was able to extend this to fully validated MMFF94 minimization capability in Jmol with empirical rules. Here's a summary of what I just checked in. version=12.3.26_dev # code: adding empirical rules to MMFF94 calculation # #

Re: [BlueObelisk-discuss] help needed -- SMILES and MMFF94 atom types

2012-05-18 Thread Geoffrey Hutchison
follow-up on this. Over the last few days I was able to extend this to fully validated MMFF94 minimization capability in Jmol with empirical rules. Here's a summary of what I just checked in. Great! I think SMARTS was definitely the way to go on this. Well, I may co-opt your SMARTS back

Re: [BlueObelisk-discuss] help needed -- SMILES and MMFF94 atom types

2012-05-18 Thread Robert Hanson
Here's my final result. I'm satisfied; I'm pretty sure there is no way to reproduce the results of the OPTIMOL results exactly. In the cases below I'm convinced there are bugs in OPTIMOL -- mostly in not consistently recognizing 5-membered rings, but also there is something odd going on in the