Re: [Blueobelisk-discuss] Revised Covalent Radii

2008-05-01 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Noel O'Boyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe such bugs should be emailed to this list?? They used to be... but it was still pointing to an old mailing list address... updated that now. Egon -- http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ ---

Re: [Blueobelisk-discuss] Revised Covalent Radii

2008-05-01 Thread Noel O'Boyle
> Message: 9 > Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 20:56:14 +0200 > From: "Egon Willighagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Blueobelisk-discuss] Revised Covalent Radii > To: "Geoffrey Hutchison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: blueobelisk-discuss@list

Re: [Blueobelisk-discuss] Revised Covalent Radii

2008-05-01 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Geoffrey Hutchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here's something to consider for the data repository. There's now a much > more complete and systematic analysis of covalent radii -- just published: > > "Covalent radii revisited" > http://www.rsc.org/Publishing/Jour

[Blueobelisk-discuss] Revised Covalent Radii

2008-05-01 Thread Geoffrey Hutchison
Here's something to consider for the data repository. There's now a much more complete and systematic analysis of covalent radii -- just published: "Covalent radii revisited" http://www.rsc.org/Publishing/Journals/DT/article.asp?doi=b801115j Cheers, -Geoff --- Prof. Geoffrey Hutchison Depar