Re: [Blueobelisk-discuss] Wikipedia page

2009-05-18 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Noel O'Boyle wrote: > 2009/5/18 Egon Willighagen : >> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Noel O'Boyle wrote: > That's certainly true. As a unrelated question, should we encourage > the participating projects/bloggers to place the logo somewhere on > their homepage

Re: [Blueobelisk-discuss] Wikipedia page

2009-05-18 Thread Noel O'Boyle
2009/5/18 Egon Willighagen : > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Noel O'Boyle wrote: >> Not to discourage you, but several (if not the majority) of the >> references to the BO paper are by people trying to find a citation for >> OpenBabel. I am hoping that this problem will eventually be resolved

Re: [Blueobelisk-discuss] Wikipedia page

2009-05-18 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Noel O'Boyle wrote: > Not to discourage you, but several (if not the majority) of the > references to the BO paper are by people trying to find a citation for > OpenBabel. I am hoping that this problem will eventually be resolved > :-) Sure. But they clearly feel

Re: [Blueobelisk-discuss] Wikipedia page

2009-05-18 Thread Noel O'Boyle
Not to discourage you, but several (if not the majority) of the references to the BO paper are by people trying to find a citation for OpenBabel. I am hoping that this problem will eventually be resolved :-) - Noel 2009/5/18 Egon Willighagen : > Hi all, > > I was just blogging about Open Data, an

[Blueobelisk-discuss] Wikipedia page

2009-05-18 Thread Egon Willighagen
Hi all, I was just blogging about Open Data, and wanted to link to the WP page, which has nicely grown, when I saw that the Blue Obelisk did not have a page yet... the paper is cited 50+ times, so I think it is not just a mere hype... So, I added: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Obelisk Please