[BlueOnyx:23195] Re: Upcoming BlueOnyx 5210R additions

2019-09-11 Thread Ralf Quint
On 9/11/2019 9:49 AM, Chris Gebhardt - VIRTBIZ Internet wrote: On 9/9/2019 11:45 PM, Michael Stauber wrote: Have tried to compile 5210R with Oracle Linux 8 which is also RHEL based ? It's been out since Jul 18. https://blogs.oracle.com/linux/announcing-the-release-of-oracle-linux-8 Huh

[BlueOnyx:23197] Re: proftpd-messages error

2019-09-11 Thread Richard Barker
Ok thank you that fixed the 5208R and yes ftp was turned off on the 5209R RC -- /*Richard C. Barker Sr. CEO & President 1-813-873-8942 ProBass Networks Inc. */ www.probassnetworks.net www.probass.net

[BlueOnyx:23198] Re: Upcoming BlueOnyx 5210R additions

2019-09-11 Thread Ernie
It's pretty sad that Centos can't keep up with RHEL releases. RedHat changed their release schedule to 6monthly but they are suppoting multiple versions at the same time. 8.1 has been available in beta since July 24th. and Centos havent done any work on 8.0 since the 7.7 code became available.

[BlueOnyx:23199] Re: Upcoming BlueOnyx 5210R additions

2019-09-11 Thread Chris Gebhardt - VIRTBIZ Internet
On 9/11/2019 4:04 PM, Ernie wrote: It's pretty sad that Centos can't keep up with RHEL releases. RedHat changed their release schedule to 6monthly but they are suppoting multiple versions at the same time. 8.1 has been available in beta since July 24th. and Centos havent done any work on 8.0

[BlueOnyx:23196] Re: proftpd-messages error

2019-09-11 Thread Michael Stauber
Hi Richard, > We have 2 servers doing this one is 5208 and the other is 5209 how do I > fix this? > > - proftpd-messages Begin >  **Unmatched Entries** >  - ROOT PRIVS: unable to setegid(): Operation not permitted >  - RELINQUISH PRIVS: unable to

[BlueOnyx:23194] Re: Upcoming BlueOnyx 5210R additions

2019-09-11 Thread Chris Gebhardt - VIRTBIZ Internet
On 9/9/2019 11:45 PM, Michael Stauber wrote: Have tried to compile 5210R with Oracle Linux 8 which is also RHEL based ? It's been out since Jul 18. https://blogs.oracle.com/linux/announcing-the-release-of-oracle-linux-8 Huh Oracle.    As in the company that bought Sun Microsystems,

[BlueOnyx:23200] Re: Upcoming BlueOnyx 5210R additions

2019-09-11 Thread Michael Stauber
Hi Ernie, > It's pretty sad that Centos can't keep up with RHEL releases. > RedHat changed their release schedule to 6monthly but they are suppoting > multiple versions at the same time. 8.1 has been available in beta since > July 24th. and Centos havent done any work on 8.0 since the 7.7 code

[BlueOnyx:23202] Re: Upcoming BlueOnyx 5210R additions

2019-09-11 Thread Ernie
Hi Michael, Lol at the WoW binge. Sounds like you have had a good think about the CentOS situation. Debian is my favourite NIX, I use Debian 10 all over the place, upgrades just work, the binary package management is better than FreeBSD, though FreeBSD is great for those that like to work

[BlueOnyx:23201] Re: Upcoming BlueOnyx 5210R additions

2019-09-11 Thread Michael Stauber
Hi Chris, > I'm given to understand that we're not sitting on pins and needles > waiting for CentOS 8 so we can finally overcome some operational > hurdle.    While Michael has been working up new features for 5210R, > these aren't items that require RHEL8. That's certainly true. With the Nginx

[BlueOnyx:23203] Re: Upcoming BlueOnyx 5210R additions

2019-09-11 Thread Michael Stauber
Hi Ernie, > Lol at the WoW binge. Yeah, I was laughing out loud when I read that. > The change from rpm to .deb is major, but mostly at the package management > level, once unpacked BX would be fine. That's true. OTOH I could directly consolidate the package building process. At the moment our

[BlueOnyx:23192] proftpd-messages error

2019-09-11 Thread Richard Barker
We have 2 servers doing this one is 5208 and the other is 5209 how do I fix this? - proftpd-messages Begin  **Unmatched Entries**  - ROOT PRIVS: unable to setegid(): Operation not permitted  - RELINQUISH PRIVS: unable to seteuid(PR_ROOT_UID):

[BlueOnyx:23193] Re: Upcoming BlueOnyx 5210R additions

2019-09-11 Thread Michael Stauber
Hi all, > I also suspect that they pulled off some developers to port CentOS 7.7, > which is also way overdue. That's now official: CentOS 8 has been delayed until the CentOS 7.7 updates have been published: https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8