Hi Chuck,
I'd just like to be able to install without LVM. I've personally never
realized any benefits from LVM - not once.
We use LVM, as there can only be four primary partitions on any disk and
BlueOnyx uses six:
/boot (500MB)
/ (6144MB)
/var(4096MB)
/tmp
Hi Radek,
As some kind of workaround at the moment I used 'small disks - below 20GB'
partition scheme available in boot menu. It made /home much bigger.
Yes, that's of course an option.
Well, if there is demand for some sensible other layouts, I can add them as
extra kickstart files to the
I have followed the advice given by Chris and made sure that all the settings
were correct in the GUI. I then removed the user and created a new user. I
still get the following error:
[127.0.0.1] #[127.0.0.1] #5.0.0 SMTP; 554 5.0.0 rewrite: excessive recursion
(max 50), ruleset canonify #SMTP#
Well the problem seems to be denyhosts
python /usr/bin/denyhosts.py --daemon --config=/etc/denyhosts.cfg
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it
[mailto:blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it] Namens Ken - Precision Web
Hosting, Inc
Verzonden: donderdag 12 januari 2012
Hi Chad.
On 1/17/2012 4:37 PM, Chad Bersche wrote:
So, I've come to the conclusion that pam_abl on its own won't do what I
want for blocking. Seems that I need to enlist the help of iptables to
really drop connection attempts that I don't want hitting my box.
DFIX is a free package that
On Jan 17, 2012, at 5:21 AM, Greg Kuhnert wrote:
Hi Chad.
On 1/17/2012 4:37 PM, Chad Bersche wrote:
So, I've come to the conclusion that pam_abl on its own won't do what I
want for blocking. Seems that I need to enlist the help of iptables to
really drop connection attempts that I don't
Hi Alan,
I have followed the advice given by Chris and made sure that all the
settings were correct in the GUI. I then removed the user and created a
new user. I still get the following error:
[127.0.0.1] #[127.0.0.1] #5.0.0 SMTP; 554 5.0.0 rewrite: excessive
recursion (max 50), ruleset
Great! I have good experience with Fail2ban on other systems. I just thought
if there was a way to use JUST pam_abl with iptables, it might be cleaner than
bolting fail2ban on top of it. The newer features in pam_abl seems to be a
very clean way to handle this, but no idea if there are any
Would it be possible to limit the amount of admin users per site? I
have several customers that think it's a good idea to make every user
an admin.
As a rule I also typically disable email for admin users. Would it
also be possible so that only the server admin could update the site
admin
So has anyone had success in using both, or are they really redundant?
I saw the posting on this list some time back where was stated that
adding fail2ban might muck up other firewall rules
(http://mail.blueonyx.it/pipermail/blueonyx/2011-March/006618.html).
I'm guessing that this is only a
10 matches
Mail list logo
