Am 13.01.22 um 20:56 schrieb Michael Meeks:
Oh - wow, I didn't know that. Wow - that is awful. That crushed my
hopes for a good Firebird based future.
So what other options are there for a sensibly licensed, in-process
database ?
Does PostgreSQL do it - could we run the server
Thanks Ilmari !
I seem to have missed that !
Will need to try it out again, and apologies for my erroneous statement
in that case.
Alex
Le 13/01/2022 à 21:08, Ilmari Lauhakangas a écrit :
On 13.1.2022 21.56, Michael Meeks wrote:
On 13/01/2022 12:35, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Endian-ness
On 13/01/2022 20:08, Ilmari Lauhakangas wrote:
On 13.1.2022 21.56, Michael Meeks wrote:
Oh - wow, I didn't know that. Wow - that is awful. That crushed
my hopes for a good Firebird based future.
Alex: seems the problem existed before Aug 2016, but not anymore.
...
'The problem was
On 13.1.2022 21.56, Michael Meeks wrote:
On 13/01/2022 12:35, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Endian-ness for embedded Firebird seems to be the elephant in the room
here. ODB files made on MacOS can not easily be shared with other
OSes/arch.
Oh - wow, I didn't know that. Wow - that is awful.
On 13/01/2022 12:35, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Thanks for jumping in on this thread, and I appreciate you having taken
the time to address my points.
Nice to talk the issues through constructively =)
Oh, yes, I still remember the pain involved in transitioning
from PPC to Intel.
Hi Alex,
On 13/01/2022 13:35, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Lest there be some misunderstanding, I also wasn't touting that Base
be atticised, far from it, that would be counter-productive for me in
particular, my concerns were levelled more at the perceived (by me)
risk that apathy, or lack of
Hi Michael,
Thanks for jumping in on this thread, and I appreciate you having taken
the time to address my points.
Comments inline :
Le 12/01/2022 à 21:45, Michael Meeks a écrit :
Unfortunately - this tends to dis-aggregate the funding again - so
we end up either with too little money
Hi Alexander,
Let me jump in with a few thoughts here.
On 12/01/2022 09:08, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> Thank you for listening to me, and apologies in advance if I may have
> ruffled a few feathers.
First - don't worry about that =) it's good to discuss this stuff; I
wish more
Hi Alex,
well... it's nice to see that you fully understand the dynamics involved
so you saved me a lot of typing ;-)
Just a few notes inline.
On 12/01/2022 16:01, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Hi Paolo,
Answers/comments/response inline :
Le 12/01/2022 à 14:56, Paolo Vecchi a écrit :
Hi Paolo,
Answers/comments/response inline :
Le 12/01/2022 à 14:56, Paolo Vecchi a écrit :
*1) Support offering from commercial entities*
There isn't much we can do in this area as each company chooses its
own business model.
Offering a SLA to fix a bug could mean spending a day in
Hi Alex,
thank you for "ruffling some feathers", this is exactly what we need!
If the community stays silent then to some it may seem that everything
is OK, we need the whole community to be more vocal and to tell us what
they think should be improved.
Your email raises 3 main concerns:
Hi Andras,
LibreOffice from the AppStore is branded Vanilla in the AppStore, but
displays as "Community" (e.g. 7.2.4.1 LibreOffice Community).
It is not identical to the "Community" version available from TDF.
Java functionality is but one part (an important one, but one part
nonetheless)
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 10:09 AM Alexander Thurgood
wrote:
>
> It seems increasingly obvious that the provider of these commercial
> versions is not interested in maintaining database functionality and the
> supporting Java functionality that accompanies the Base module. The
> reasons for
Hi *,
Sophie suggested that I might want to raise what I perceive as an issue
here on this list, that is connected, but not identical, to the issue
relating to the Attic question, and the questions around the sidelining
of features/functionality in commercially developed and distributed
14 matches
Mail list logo
