On 2020/07/13 14:20, Telesto wrote:
>The potential customer has to figure out who to contact themselves. Sending
>customers more or less in the dark.
I'll grant that the LibO webpage on obtaining professional, paid
support, could be clearer. From my perspective, the biggest change to
that page
On a upside-down view, my proposal is to have a LibreOffice "as-is" for
download from TDF website as
Download LibreOffice from Collabora (and have C'bra brand/splash)
Download LibreOffice from CIB (and have CIB brand/splash)
2 packages, gratis, open source, same software, no fancy edition, no
Op 13-7-2020 om 15:13 schreef Regina Henschel:
Hi all,
Justin Luth schrieb am 13-Jul-20 um 13:08:
I think the best solution probably lies in just using simple branding
of "LibreOffice", and "LibreOffice LTS" for eco-system branding.
I support this. In addition LibreOffice partners should be
Hi Regina,
First - thank you for your help getting at least one TDF tender
un-blocked to get that ODF 1.3 support implemented. That's much
appreciated :-)
On 13/07/2020 14:13, Regina Henschel wrote:
> "Edition" itself is dangerous too, because it implies, that the download
> from TDF
Hi
Am 13.07.20 um 15:13 schrieb Regina Henschel:
> To make these more visible, I can think of changes for the download page:
> Introduction
> Download option "fresh"
> Download option "still".
>
> Introduction
> The Document Foundation (TDF) provides LibreOffice releases on a /time based
>
Hi all,
Justin Luth schrieb am 13-Jul-20 um 13:08:
I think the best solution probably lies in just using simple branding of
"LibreOffice", and "LibreOffice LTS" for eco-system branding.
I support this. In addition LibreOffice partners should be allowed to
put a "powered by XYZ" on the start
I think the best solution probably lies in just using simple branding of
"LibreOffice", and "LibreOffice LTS" for eco-system branding.
As many have already said, LibreOffice Personal implies licensing -
which simply isn't true, and so is a particularly bad term.
LibreOffice Community
