Hi Brett!
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 2:05 PM Brett Cornwall wrote:
>
> Other Free Software projects have had for-profit entities created
> underneath the stewardship of a non-profit; Mozilla Corporation and
> Canonical are two living examples. Sacrifices to user empowerment are often
> made at
No, I was referring to the trademark licenses TDF extends to uses that are
not allowed under that policy (such as branding by companies or usage on
goods). In those cases, TDF offers a commercial-style trademark license. To
discuss it further I suggest we move to the Members list as it's another
In the public board call today it was said that the proposed commercial
entity The Document Collective should not be owned by TDF because of
litigation risk. The risk is thought to form due to the anticipated
significant amount of funds moved through TDC (which will lead TDC to
enter into
Hi Board,
Hi Simon,
you just were telling us in the public part of the board meeting that
the TDF can remove the trade mark of the TDC with a prenotification of
30 days.
Is the trade mark policy basically the one published in the wiki? [0] Or
is it another one (and is this the published
Hi Dennis,
On 28/02/2020 13:04, Dennis Roczek wrote:
> you just were telling us in the public part of the board meeting that
> the TDF can remove the trade mark of the TDC with a prenotification of
> 30 days.
That is the plan.
> Is the trade mark policy basically the one published in
It would be better to conduct this discussion on the Members list.
S.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 12:57 PM Ilmari Lauhakangas <
ilmari.lauhakan...@libreoffice.org> wrote:
> In the public board call today it was said that the proposed commercial
> entity The Document Collective should not be owned
I, Cor Nouws, elected member of the Board of Directors of The Document
Foundation, hereby and until further notice, nominate the following
deputies to represent me during board calls and meetings, in the order
set forth below:
1. Nicolas Christener
2. Paolo Vecchi
Cheers,
Cor
--
Cor
Hi Brett,
First thank you for your questions; cogent, lucid, well articulated &
challenging :-)
On 28/02/2020 14:04, Brett Cornwall wrote:
> Other Free Software projects have had for-profit entities created
> underneath the stewardship of a non-profit; Mozilla Corporation and
> Canonical
On 28.02.20 15:04, Brett Cornwall wrote:
Other Free Software projects have had for-profit entities created
underneath the stewardship of a non-profit; Mozilla Corporation and
Canonical are two living examples. Sacrifices to user empowerment are
off-topic, but: how is Canonical related to
Other Free Software projects have had for-profit entities created underneath
the stewardship of a non-profit; Mozilla Corporation and Canonical are two
living examples. Sacrifices to user empowerment are often made at Mozilla
Corporation (e.g. Pocket integration, advertising partnerships to
10 matches
Mail list logo
