Dear list,
this email is a very generic reminder of how we as a board would like
to communicate. It would be great, if we could also inspire everyone
else on this list to follow our lead there.
We strive to:
- be inclusive, and patient
- recognise each other as humans (with our different quirks
Hi Paolo, all,
Paolo Vecchi wrote:
> On 27/05/2022 12:31, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> > Process-wise, my call to work out a proposal how to come to a joint
> > text (in a small circle) is still open.
>
> I've asked many times but still no answer. Will you one day explain why you
> keep wanting to
Hi Kendy, all,
On 26/05/2022 17.08, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Good idea, Paolo, thank you. The new version that merges the proposals
is in:
https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/f/960049
as
TDF-In-House-Developers-Proposal-v2.1.odt
All my changes are change-tracked, so it should make
Hi Andreas,
On 25/05/2022 22.57, Andreas Mantke wrote:
I have worked together with a group of people on documents during the
last 1.5 year. The documents were not in an editable (e.g. ODF) format.
But everyone, who want to improve one of the documents, was able to
contribute and improve the
So, why no one raised their voices when members of the ecosystem gave their
opinions in public interviews defaming TDF's activities, huh?
El 28 de mayo de 2022 12:09:33 p. m. GMT-03:00, Simon Phipps
escribió:
>Thanks for this, Jeremy.
>
>Since this is not the first time this user has
Hi Paolo,
thanks for your reply.
On 25/05/2022 11.54, Paolo Vecchi wrote:
While I am generally in favor of Paolo's proposal, I share the
impression that various concerns or suggestions have not been dealt
with adequately so far.
For example: Michael has asked for an ODF version of the
Thanks for this, Jeremy.
Since this is not the first time this user has behaved in a manner
detrimental to the discourse on the list, including displaying the patterns
of behaviour you describe towards me as well, I join you in your complaint
and ask the Board to intervene.
Cheers
Simon
On
Hi,
On 27/05/2022 12:31, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Hi Paolo, all,
Paolo Vecchi wrote:
That document clearly contains another proposal which should go its own way
instead of trying to make it pass as a "merged" proposal.
The intention here (and I would very much like to support that idea),
is
