Re: [board-discuss] [DISCUSS] Proposed update for the CoI Policy: version 1.3.2

2022-02-24 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 12:41 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: > Hi all, > > Paolo Vecchi wrote on 24/02/2022 09:06: > > > On 24/02/2022 03:19, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > > > How do you suggest we move this forward then? The current state > > > of the policy is still considered not ok for some. > > All of

Re: [board-discuss] [DISCUSS] Proposed update for the CoI Policy: version 1.3.2

2022-02-24 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi all, Paolo Vecchi wrote on 24/02/2022 09:06: On 24/02/2022 03:19, Thorsten Behrens wrote: How do you suggest we move this forward then? The current state of the policy is still considered not ok for some. All of us read and accepted to be bound by the current version of the CoI Policy by

Re: [board-discuss] [DISCUSS] Proposed update for the CoI Policy: version 1.3.2

2022-02-24 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Thorsten, all, Thorsten Behrens píše v Út 15. 02. 2022 v 19:17 +0100: > there's another update to the board CoI policy now in draft status, > I've uploaded it with enabled change tracking here: > > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/images/e/e5/BoD_Conflict_of_Inte >

Re: [board-discuss] [DISCUSS] Proposed update for the CoI Policy: version 1.3.2

2022-02-24 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi Thorsten, On 24/02/2022 10:18, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Hi Paolo, Paolo Vecchi wrote: I believe no one in the current board has any problem with it or wouldn't have ran for a board position. That is in direct contradiction to my statement up-thread. So what follows is not a workable

Re: [board-discuss] [DISCUSS] Proposed update for the CoI Policy: version 1.3.2

2022-02-24 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi Paolo, Paolo Vecchi wrote: > I believe no one in the current board has any problem with it or > wouldn't have ran for a board position. > That is in direct contradiction to my statement up-thread. So what follows is not a workable proposal. But let's hear what the rest of the board thinks.

Re: [board-discuss] [DISCUSS] Proposed update for the CoI Policy: version 1.3.2

2022-02-24 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi Thorsten, On 24/02/2022 03:19, Thorsten Behrens wrote: How do you suggest we move this forward then? The current state of the policy is still considered not ok for some. All of us read and accepted to be bound by the current version of the CoI Policy by being a member of the Board of

Re: [board-discuss] [DISCUSS] Proposed update for the CoI Policy: version 1.3.2

2022-02-23 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi Paolo, Paolo Vecchi wrote: > > Modifications are in sections 5.1 and 6.3. The changes were discussed > > in the legal group, and drafted by Mike. > > I had a look at my emails and the only reference I found about the changes > in the CoI by a member of the legal oversight team (me) said that

Re: [board-discuss] [DISCUSS] Proposed update for the CoI Policy: version 1.3.2

2022-02-15 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi Thorsten, On 15/02/2022 19:17, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Dear board (current & new), *, there's another update to the board CoI policy now in draft status, I've uploaded it with enabled change tracking here:

[board-discuss] [DISCUSS] Proposed update for the CoI Policy: version 1.3.2

2022-02-15 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Dear board (current & new), *, there's another update to the board CoI policy now in draft status, I've uploaded it with enabled change tracking here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/images/e/e5/BoD_Conflict_of_Interest_Policy_ver1_3_2_draft_2022-02-15.pdf Modifications are in sections