Re: [board-discuss] no obvious double-standards (was: List Moderation - Apply Double Standards?)

2022-07-19 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi Cor, On 19/07/2022 17:49, Cor Nouws wrote: that is spreads misinformation about what the CoI policy is for please do explain to us what you think the Conflict of Interest Policy is for as some might have got it completely wrong then. Ciao Paolo -- Paolo Vecchi - Member of the Board of

Re: [board-discuss] no obvious double-standards (was: List Moderation - Apply Double Standards?)

2022-07-19 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi, Paolo Vecchi wrote on 15/07/2022 13:24: I believe his assumptions come from the following statements: "Therefore I really think that it is needed that this type of mail is not moderated through." and "So again, I regret that it has been moderated through in this form. I will further

Re: [board-discuss] no obvious double-standards (was: List Moderation - Apply Double Standards?)

2022-07-15 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi all, On 15/07/2022 11:52, Thorsten Behrens wrote: It looks like if some of the board members, which support the list moderation, have the intention to ban uncomfortable discussions in terms of content and the process from this list. The fact that your email passed moderation should be

[board-discuss] no obvious double-standards (was: List Moderation - Apply Double Standards?)

2022-07-15 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi Andreas, all, your assessment of the situation does not seem accurate. The fact that all TDF directors can currently approve emails to this list, should ensure balance. Andreas Mantke wrote: > The list was set under moderation, because some of the board members > felt, the discussion here was