Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: [board-discuss] Initiative to improve communication channels

2020-07-17 Thread Daniel Armando Rodriguez
El 2020-07-17 11:12, Thorsten Behrens escribió: Hi Franklin, all, Franklin Weng wrote: BTW, even if it becomes 15th useless channel, which can be tweaked, tried and improved from the running experiences, it will not be a big deal IMO. Sure, it would create more silos & further fracture the co

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: [board-discuss] Initiative to improve communication channels

2020-07-17 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi Franklin, all, Franklin Weng wrote: > BTW, even if it becomes 15th useless channel, which can be tweaked, > tried and improved from the running experiences, it will not be a > big deal IMO. > Sure, it would create more silos & further fracture the community. As I said during the board call - t

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: [board-discuss] Initiative to improve communication channels

2020-07-17 Thread Franklin Weng
Agree with Sophie's and Daniel's POV.  Civic technology like this has been proved successful in many countries/areas including Taiwan. BTW, even if it becomes 15th useless channel, which can be tweaked, tried and improved from the running experiences, it will not be a big deal IMO. -- Franklin

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: [board-discuss] Initiative to improve communication channels

2020-07-17 Thread sophi
Hi, Le 09/07/2020 à 16:03, Daniel Armando Rodriguez a écrit : > El 2020-07-09 06:05, Ilmari Lauhakangas escribió: >> Thorsten Behrens kirjoitti 9.7.2020 klo 11.44: >>> Ilmari Lauhakangas wrote: DemocracyOS vs. anything we currently have is an apples to oranges comparison meaning we *can't

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: [board-discuss] Initiative to improve communication channels

2020-07-09 Thread Daniel Armando Rodriguez
El 2020-07-09 06:05, Ilmari Lauhakangas escribió: Thorsten Behrens kirjoitti 9.7.2020 klo 11.44: Ilmari Lauhakangas wrote: DemocracyOS vs. anything we currently have is an apples to oranges comparison meaning we *can't* shut anything down. But how would DemocracyOS then help to solve the too-m

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: [board-discuss] Initiative to improve communication channels

2020-07-09 Thread Ilmari Lauhakangas
Thorsten Behrens kirjoitti 9.7.2020 klo 11.44: Ilmari Lauhakangas wrote: DemocracyOS vs. anything we currently have is an apples to oranges comparison meaning we *can't* shut anything down. But how would DemocracyOS then help to solve the too-many-channels problem? In my view it would not he

Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: [board-discuss] Initiative to improve communication channels

2020-07-09 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Ilmari Lauhakangas wrote: > DemocracyOS vs. anything we currently have is an apples to oranges > comparison meaning we *can't* shut anything down. > But how would DemocracyOS then help to solve the too-many-channels problem? Cheers, -- Thorsten signature.asc Description: PGP signature