Re: [board-discuss] Objective: Postponing Hiring TDF-Developer To 2024 or Later?

2022-05-25 Thread Andreas Mantke
Am 25.05.22 um 08:54 schrieb Michael Weghorn: Hi Andreas, all, On 24/05/2022 23.09, Andreas Mantke wrote: I follow the thread(s) about hiring two in-ho use developers by TDF for some month yet. I got the impression that there are some TDF members which might have no real interest in getting

Re: [board-discuss] Objective: Postponing Hiring TDF-Developer To 2024 or Later?

2022-05-25 Thread Andreas Mantke
Hi, Am 25.05.22 um 10:05 schrieb Thorsten Behrens: Hi Andreas, all, Andreas Mantke wrote: It seemed there is a approach behind this behavior: postpone the whole topic as far as possible. And try to frustrate the members who try to drive this topic forward. And prevent this project in the end

Re: [board-discuss] Objective: Postponing Hiring TDF-Developer To 2024 or Later?

2022-05-25 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi Andreas, all, Andreas Mantke wrote: > It seemed there is a approach behind this behavior: postpone the whole > topic as far as possible. And try to frustrate the members who try to > drive this topic forward. And prevent this project in the end or to vary > it that it will not disturb own

Re: [board-discuss] Objective: Postponing Hiring TDF-Developer To 2024 or Later?

2022-05-25 Thread Michael Weghorn
Hi Andreas, all, On 24/05/2022 23.09, Andreas Mantke wrote: I follow the thread(s) about hiring two in-ho use developers by TDF for some month yet. I got the impression that there are some TDF members which might have no real interest in getting this task done. They are asking only questions

Re: [board-discuss] Proposal for in-house developers at TDF

2022-05-25 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi Paolo, hi Kendy, I wrote: > Could I ask the two of you to work out a joint proposal, how to > finalize the document? > > It could be a working group or a shared, editable document, or > something else entirely - but would be great to see this finished > soonish, and with wide board support. >

Re: [board-discuss] Objective: Postponing Hiring TDF-Developer To 2024 or Later?

2022-05-25 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Dear list, Paolo Vecchi wrote: > He may have missed my emails but I suppose that our chairman, which is also > his direct superior at work, could have made him notice that he overlooked > some emails from a fellow member of the board. > Just to clarify - Gabor does not receive orders or

Re: [board-discuss] Objective: Postponing Hiring TDF-Developer To 2024 or Later?

2022-05-25 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi all, On 25/05/2022 08:54, Michael Weghorn wrote: Hi Andreas, all, On 24/05/2022 23.09, Andreas Mantke wrote: I follow the thread(s) about hiring two in-ho use developers by TDF for some month yet. I got the impression that there are some TDF members which might have no real interest in

Re: [board-discuss] Proposal for in-house developers at TDF

2022-05-25 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi, On 25/05/2022 12:48, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Hi Paolo, all, Paolo Vecchi wrote: On 25/05/2022 10:19, Thorsten Behrens wrote: To reiterate the question, is that something the two of you would be willing to collaborate on? It seems like you missed my previous answer:

Re: [board-discuss] Proposal for in-house developers at TDF

2022-05-25 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi, On 25/05/2022 10:19, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Hi Paolo, hi Kendy, I wrote: Could I ask the two of you to work out a joint proposal, how to finalize the document? It could be a working group or a shared, editable document, or something else entirely - but would be great to see this

Re: [board-discuss] Proposal for in-house developers at TDF

2022-05-25 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi Paolo, all, Paolo Vecchi wrote: > On 25/05/2022 10:19, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > > To reiterate the question, is that something the two of you would be > > willing to collaborate on? > It seems like you missed my previous answer: > >

Re: [board-discuss] Proposal for in-house developers at TDF

2022-05-25 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Paolo, Paolo Vecchi píše v St 25. 05. 2022 v 12:13 +0200: > I've been waiting for Kendy to propose improvements for the past 3 > months but I'm yet to receive some. I see - I was waiting for the Board Working group being set up, as was proposed by Emiliano, and as seemed to me as the agreed

Re: [board-discuss] Proposal for in-house developers at TDF

2022-05-25 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Paolo, Paolo Vecchi píše v St 25. 05. 2022 v 13:41 +0200: > Michael Meeks made a completely different proposal to employ a > mentor. That is not my reading of the proposal. Also what I like about the proposal is that it addresses my questions I had wrt. the tasking and management; where

Re: [board-discuss] Proposal for in-house developers at TDF

2022-05-25 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi Kendy, that's an interesting turn. I guess you could have helped out Michael Meeks 3 months ago as it seemed to be such a big issue for him, I mean he's your boss so it would be natural for any employee to help out if he can't find a way to do it. It is also interesting to see that you

Re: [board-discuss] Proposal for in-house developers at TDF

2022-05-25 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hello, Jan Holesovsky píše v St 25. 05. 2022 v 14:18 +0200: > To me it seems like those two proposals can be merged together to > create something good for TDF, if there is a will for that. And > there is from my side. And to show I mean it, I've converted the document to an editable version.

Re: [board-discuss] Proposal for in-house developers at TDF

2022-05-25 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi Kendy, On 25/05/2022 14:18, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Paolo, Paolo Vecchi píše v St 25. 05. 2022 v 13:41 +0200: Michael Meeks made a completely different proposal to employ a mentor. That is not my reading of the proposal. You may have missed a few details: The proposal is: "Hire a