On 5 June 2011 17:31, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
2011/6/5 André Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net:
In your questionary, the questions to me seem to be of two kinds:
1) questions that are targeted to individuals actions (sign Apache CLA,
contribute code to Apache as well as to
:) I think i only read the bad parts of Charles' post
completely
missed the good. Great to hear it's beginning to click into place :)
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Wed
Oops forgot the link!
Its here
https://theingots.org/community/OOoCert
On 8 September 2011 11:50, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 September 2011 15:56, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Hi :)
Bad was not really the right word. Negative would have been more apt.
Anyway
I think part of the problem is the rise of client server databases with the
internet. It's a bit of an irony because to start with OOo used the
principle of connecting to a database rather than including the old Addabas
that was with StarOffice. Snag now is that even if the use of Base is
minority
The general notion here was that
having a separate Base list would not serve the purpose - so what
other, concrete proposals are there to discuss within the SC?
The general notion you're saying, IMHO, comes from people who are not
directly involved in Base's issue itself. How many of
On 13 September 2011 13:32, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Hello Ian, Tom, Paulo,
2011/9/13 Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com
The general notion here was that
having a separate Base list would not serve the purpose - so what
other, concrete proposals
On 23 February 2012 10:35, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com wrote:
Hi Jaime,
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 20:13 +0100, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
does anyone have a reliable source for the actual Office Suite Maket
Share?
Not really a question for the board list :-)
Basically I need to
