Re: [board-discuss] [DISCUSS] LibreOffice Online freeze-related decisions

2021-02-10 Thread Guilhem Moulin
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 15:22:06 +0100, Emiliano Vavassori wrote:
>> But what do you mean by the second part of your proposal: “(if feasible)
>> point TDF repo on GitHub on git/gerrit on TDF infra”?  I can't think of
>> an interpretation that's not already covered by “revert decision 1b”.
> 
> Indeed. The second part of the phrase was only meant to explicitly state
> what is going to happen in the end (including the technical clearance to
> do it). "Revert decision 1b" should be quite clear by itself.

Ack, thanks for clarifying!  Part of the confusion was that some of you
voted in favor of 1b then in favor of reverting it, but well I guess
everyone is allowed to change their opinion :-)
 
> As stated (elsewhere), I intend these modifications as a temporary way
> until a definitive and shared way will be decided by the Board.

Thank you for spelling this out.

-- 
Guilhem.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [board-discuss] [DISCUSS] LibreOffice Online freeze-related decisions

2021-02-10 Thread Emiliano Vavassori
Il 10/02/21 13:08, Guilhem Moulin ha scritto:
> Before that https://github.com/libreoffice/online was a read-only mirror
> for https://git.libreoffice.org/online , so by “revert decision 1b” I
> guess you mean to make it so again?  Should both this and
> https://listarchives.tdf.io/i/IbatXLjaK38BCbLBNiiw7Ned be approved, this
> would mean that the tip of the master branch on both
> https://git.libreoffice.org/online and https://github.com/libreoffice/online
> would point to 4ca4fd34169dd386c2fa57bd28650c00b23d6864^.  (As was the
> case between the Oct 1 and the implementation of the aforementioned BoD
> decision.)

That's exactly what I propose, in a much richer and precise description.

> But what do you mean by the second part of your proposal: “(if feasible)
> point TDF repo on GitHub on git/gerrit on TDF infra”?  I can't think of
> an interpretation that's not already covered by “revert decision 1b”.

Indeed. The second part of the phrase was only meant to explicitly state
what is going to happen in the end (including the technical clearance to
do it). "Revert decision 1b" should be quite clear by itself.

As stated (elsewhere), I intend these modifications as a temporary way
until a definitive and shared way will be decided by the Board.

Cheers,
-- 
Emiliano Vavassori, Member of the Board of Directors
The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE
Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [board-discuss] [DISCUSS] LibreOffice Online freeze-related decisions

2021-02-10 Thread Guilhem Moulin
Hi Emiliano,

On Fri, 05 Feb 2021 at 14:26:53 +0100, Emiliano Vavassori wrote:
> * revert decision 1b and (if feasible) point TDF repo on GitHub on
> git/gerrit on TDF infra.

Other BoD members are already voting on this but I have trouble understanding
what that means.  From https://listarchives.tdf.io/i/gVuesWC6ZI0MUequqiqJ3nrc

| 1b. to switch the https://github.com/libreoffice/online mirror to
| instead mirror the Collabora repo, for the time being, and make sure we
| catch pull requests there, e.g. via the mentoring alias on TDF side

Before that https://github.com/libreoffice/online was a read-only mirror
for https://git.libreoffice.org/online , so by “revert decision 1b” I
guess you mean to make it so again?  Should both this and
https://listarchives.tdf.io/i/IbatXLjaK38BCbLBNiiw7Ned be approved, this
would mean that the tip of the master branch on both
https://git.libreoffice.org/online and https://github.com/libreoffice/online
would point to 4ca4fd34169dd386c2fa57bd28650c00b23d6864^.  (As was the
case between the Oct 1 and the implementation of the aforementioned BoD
decision.)

But what do you mean by the second part of your proposal: “(if feasible)
point TDF repo on GitHub on git/gerrit on TDF infra”?  I can't think of
an interpretation that's not already covered by “revert decision 1b”.

Cheers
-- 
Guilhem.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature