Re: [board-discuss] Board of Directors Meeting 2022-09-05

2022-09-22 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Paolo,

Paolo Vecchi píše v So 10. 09. 2022 v 15:45 +0200:

> > I am happy to share the folder (read-only) to the general public
> > too,
> > but I'd like to have Paolo's OK before I do - Paolo, is it OK for
> > you? 
> 
> I'm totally fine with sharing the folder to all so that they can see
> how it changed over time.

Thank you, it can be seen here:

  https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/s/zfoRygFbBgJZZcj

> I've uploaded version 2.8 with some comments.
> 
> I've accepted several changes even if don't satisfy me fully but a
> decent compromise today is better than nothing at all.
> 
> It took a very long time to get here so I hope that the long
> discussions haven't put off potential candidates.
> 
> I believe this version (2.8) should now be sent to our legal counsel
> for verification and the result should be voted on.
> 
> Would you agree? 

I've added answers to your comments as:

  TDF-In-House-Developers-Proposal-v2-8-Merged-answers.odt

For many of them, it is just an "OK, accepted"; just few bits around
the ESC are controversial or even not acceptable for me - but I've
outlined those already in the call on Monday.

Can you please have a look?  Thank you in advance!

All the best,
Kendy


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy



Re: [board-discuss] Board of Directors Meeting 2022-09-05

2022-09-10 Thread Paolo Vecchi

Hi Kendy, Andreas and all,

On 09/09/2022 19:44, Jan Holesovsky wrote:

Hi Andreas,

Andreas Mantke píše v Pá 09. 09. 2022 v 16:50 +0200:


Thus it would be great, if you could make the current state of the
documents (maybe with the changes done) available for the interested
community.

It is still all developing in the same folder as before, available for
all the TDF members:

   https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/apps/files/?dir=/Developers

It contains all the versions since 2.0, and most of them have change
tracking turned on.

I am happy to share the folder (read-only) to the general public too,
but I'd like to have Paolo's OK before I do - Paolo, is it OK for you?



I'm totally fine with sharing the folder to all so that they can see how 
it changed over time.


I've uploaded version 2.8 with some comments.

I've accepted several changes even if don't satisfy me fully but a 
decent compromise today is better than nothing at all.


It took a very long time to get here so I hope that the long discussions 
haven't put off potential candidates.


I believe this version (2.8) should now be sent to our legal counsel for 
verification and the result should be voted on.


Would you agree?



All the best,
Kendy


Ciao

Paolo

--
Paolo Vecchi - Member of the Board of Directors
The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE
Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
Legal details:https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [board-discuss] Board of Directors Meeting 2022-09-05

2022-09-09 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Andreas,

Andreas Mantke píše v Pá 09. 09. 2022 v 16:50 +0200:

> Thus it would be great, if you could make the current state of the
> documents (maybe with the changes done) available for the interested
> community.

It is still all developing in the same folder as before, available for
all the TDF members:

  https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/apps/files/?dir=/Developers

It contains all the versions since 2.0, and most of them have change
tracking turned on.

I am happy to share the folder (read-only) to the general public too,
but I'd like to have Paolo's OK before I do - Paolo, is it OK for you?

All the best,
Kendy


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy



Re: [board-discuss] Board of Directors Meeting 2022-09-05

2022-09-09 Thread Andreas Mantke

Hi Jan, hi all,

Am 08.09.22 um 23:45 schrieb Jan Holesovsky:

Hi Andreas,

Andreas Mantke píše v Čt 08. 09. 2022 v 21:01 +0200:


* Anything closer to be voted on? (Thorsten)
   * another round of editing document (Kendy)
   * closer to be voted on
   * it's in shared folder
   * another round of edits on his documents
   * Paolo made last edits on Friday, will look into it soon
   * glad to hear, re-added some comments to latest version (Paolo)
   * no massive rush right now, been in the making for a while
(Thorsten)
   AI: add to agenda of next board call
Folder with developers proposal (under Shared/Developers)
Latest version 2.6 - Comments in version 2.5-With-Comments
https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/f/960049


looks like I learned another sort of management strategies:

management by continuous postponement

I am not sure what do you mean; we are working hard with Paolo on the
document to minimize areas that are mutually unacceptable, and I am
pleased to see that the amount of problematic points is decreasing with
every version.

I'm always interested in learning new and promising managing methods.
And this here seemed a one that I have not learned about.


If you compare the document in the current state with my or Paolo's
first version, you will see the huge amount of work we have both put
into this.


I believe this is true, but the links above in the meeting minutes are
not public (also not public for logged in users). Thus no user of this
list could proof your statement.

Thus it would be great, if you could make the current state of the
documents (maybe with the changes done) available for the interested
community.

This would help to follow the process and understand the pro and cons of
this management method.

Regards,
Andreas

--
## Free Software Advocate
## Plone add-on developer
## My blog: http://www.amantke.de/blog


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy



Re: [board-discuss] Board of Directors Meeting 2022-09-05

2022-09-08 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Andreas,

Andreas Mantke píše v Čt 08. 09. 2022 v 21:01 +0200:

> > * Anything closer to be voted on? (Thorsten)
> >   * another round of editing document (Kendy)
> >   * closer to be voted on
> >   * it's in shared folder
> >   * another round of edits on his documents
> >   * Paolo made last edits on Friday, will look into it soon
> >   * glad to hear, re-added some comments to latest version (Paolo)
> >   * no massive rush right now, been in the making for a while
> > (Thorsten)
> >   AI: add to agenda of next board call
> > Folder with developers proposal (under Shared/Developers)
> > Latest version 2.6 - Comments in version 2.5-With-Comments
> > https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/f/960049
> > 
> looks like I learned another sort of management strategies:
> 
> management by continuous postponement

I am not sure what do you mean; we are working hard with Paolo on the
document to minimize areas that are mutually unacceptable, and I am
pleased to see that the amount of problematic points is decreasing with
every version.

If you compare the document in the current state with my or Paolo's
first version, you will see the huge amount of work we have both put
into this.

I am also extremely pleased that we are both able to work on one shared
ODT document together.

As to the current state, I cannot speak for Paolo (so Paolo, please
correct me if I'm wrong), but from my point of view it is now clear
that:

1. We both agree TDF should hire developers.  I've moved on
   from my "more development mentors instead of developers, please"
   position long ago; I think it was even documented on this ML.

2. We both agree that the Board has the ultimate deciding power.

3. We have accepted and/or removed many problematic parts (ranging from
   words to full paragraphs) all over the document.

4. We are still finding middle-ground for the role of ESC.  (For
   example, the idea that TDF in-house developers wouldn't be bound
   by ESC rules and decisions the same way as volunteer and/or
   corporate contributors is not acceptable for me, and so far I am
   unfortunately failing to come up with formulation that is acceptable
   for Paolo.)

5. We are still finding middle-ground for some details around knowledge
   sharing/mentoring in areas where the in-house developers become
   experts.  (But I think in this area, we are much closer to
   a conclusion, compared to 4.)

I've spent many hours answering the comments in the 2.5-With-Comments
today, and I'm finalizing the 2.7 that will be hopefully again one more
step closer to being acceptable by both of us; but unfortunately it is
too late to upload it now - hope to do it tomorrow early.

All the best,
Kendy


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy



Re: [board-discuss] Board of Directors Meeting 2022-09-05

2022-09-08 Thread Andreas Mantke

Am 08.09.22 um 20:24 schrieb Florian Effenberger:

The Document Foundation
Board of Directors Meeting 2022-09-05
Meeting Minutes



(...)
2. Status Report, Discuss: Merged developer proposal (tdf-board, Jan
Holesovsky, Paolo Vecchi, 10 mins)

   * should the merged proposal be ready
   * have a last round of discussion
   * if conclusive - vote & budget for it

   Otherwise, re-evaluate our approach.

   References:
   * Shared folder with the versions:
https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/apps/files/?dir=/Developers

* Anything closer to be voted on? (Thorsten)
  * another round of editing document (Kendy)
  * closer to be voted on
  * it's in shared folder
  * another round of edits on his documents
  * Paolo made last edits on Friday, will look into it soon
  * glad to hear, re-added some comments to latest version (Paolo)
  * no massive rush right now, been in the making for a while (Thorsten)
  AI: add to agenda of next board call
Folder with developers proposal (under Shared/Developers)
Latest version 2.6 - Comments in version 2.5-With-Comments
https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/f/960049


looks like I learned another sort of management strategies:

management by continuous postponement

Regards,
Andreas

--
## Free Software Advocate
## Plone add-on developer
## My blog: http://www.amantke.de/blog


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy