Re: [boinc_dev] William

2013-06-19 Thread William
Hello! http://hotelinter.org/hfvsfa/ogent/qdedm/dwdtz.html?ze=bobtb William vtevy ___ boinc_dev mailing list boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom

Re: [boinc_dev] Can we do shared memory with no disk usage?

2013-06-19 Thread Steffen Möller
___ boinc_dev mailing list boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.

Re: [boinc_dev] Can we do shared memory with no disk usage?

2013-06-19 Thread Nicolás Alvarez
2013/6/18 Heinz-Bernd Eggenstein heinz-bernd.eggenst...@aei.mpg.de: Hi all, Interesting. I guess it would be useful to run BOINC on a dedicated partition (e.g. ext hard disk/ USB stick) to isolate BOINC's contribution to the stats. Or drop iostat and use iotop instead, which gives realtime

Re: [boinc_dev] Validator problem

2013-06-19 Thread McLeod, John
Different processors can come up with slightly different results for each step in a long calculation. If you allow processors of different types to crunch the same work unit, then you will have to write some fuzziness into your validator. -Original Message- From: boinc_dev