On 08-Dec-2010 12:21 PM, Richard Haselgrove wrote:
Now that SETI is back up, details have emerged of a host where the records
appear to indicate that v6.08 (plan_class cuda) is faster than v6.09
(cuda23). At SETI, this would be unusual - cuda23 is usually significantly
faster than cuda,
Sure, host_app_versions.php lets the user know what the server currently
believes to be the situation.
But my question was more directed to finding out what the actual current
performance would be, with either or both applications - just in case the
server assessment had become disconnected
Not sure what you're asking; the only way to update the estimates
is to run more jobs with each version,
which I just checked in a change to do.
-- David
On 08-Dec-2010 4:04 PM, Richard Haselgrove wrote:
Sure, host_app_versions.php lets the user know what the server currently
believes to be the
