Re: [boinc_dev] William

2013-06-19 Thread William
Hello!
 http://hotelinter.org/hfvsfa/ogent/qdedm/dwdtz.html?ze=bobtb


 William




 vtevy
___
boinc_dev mailing list
boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.


Re: [boinc_dev] Can we do shared memory with no disk usage?

2013-06-19 Thread Steffen Möller

___
boinc_dev mailing list
boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.


Re: [boinc_dev] Can we do shared memory with no disk usage?

2013-06-19 Thread Nicolás Alvarez
2013/6/18 Heinz-Bernd Eggenstein heinz-bernd.eggenst...@aei.mpg.de:
 Hi all,

 Interesting. I guess it would be useful to run BOINC on a dedicated
 partition (e.g. ext hard disk/ USB stick)  to isolate BOINC's contribution
 to the stats.

Or drop iostat and use iotop instead, which gives realtime I/O stats
per *thread*.

-- 
Nicolás
___
boinc_dev mailing list
boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.

Re: [boinc_dev] Validator problem

2013-06-19 Thread McLeod, John
Different processors can come up with slightly different results for each step 
in a long calculation.  If you allow processors of different types to crunch 
the same work unit, then you will have to write some fuzziness into your 
validator.

-Original Message-
From: boinc_dev [mailto:boinc_dev-boun...@ssl.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of 
radim.vanco
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 7:26 AM
To: boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu
Subject: [boinc_dev] Validator problem

Hi,
I have one problem with this custom validator. It is based on custom validator 
on wiki, it compares three numbers with decimal point and check structure 
before it. It works fine but after some time (two - four  days) it will start 
to mark all results as inconclusive. If I test it on only a few WUs it works 
exactly as I want but when there are many results then it starts after few days 
mark everything as invalid. Does anyone know what could cause the problem? I 
attached source code of the validator.

Radim



___
boinc_dev mailing list
boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.